|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Plugin Reverbs vs Outboard Reverbs
I presently have Sonnox, Eventide, Sound Toys, McDsp, and Digi effects plugins. I also have my ole Lex PCM 80 outboard box. With the main consideration being reverb, how do the modern outboard boxes stack up to the plugins? I wonder about PCM96, Eventide, Bricasti, etc outboard boxes.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Plugin Reverbs vs Outboard Reverbs
I don't hear a lot of difference between plugin or outboard reverb, frankly it doesn't surprise me, it's only dsp and as long as the programmer isn't programming for pure efficiency there is no reason there should be a difference.
Also a lot of times people get too involved with this reverb against that one, it's often just a bit of "splog" to give some sense of depth to a mix. I think that many people forget that prior to the 80's many studio's would be blessed to have a choice of more that one or two verbs, three if they were really lucky. Often I find some of the more "clunky" less smooth verbs sit much better in the mix as they don't take up the space. Things like Altiverb, whilst very good and often entirely appropriate can be overkill. Personally I love the three offerings from Digidesign. Of course YMMV. Roland |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Plugin Reverbs vs Outboard Reverbs
I've been SLOWLY migrating to ITB mixing, more of a Hybrid thing, the last few years - But after a decade of Pro-tooling, I handed in 2 records last year, that were completely Mixed ITB, and I like listening to them, I'm not pulling the "My hand was forced by the powers that be" card, and apologizing for those records, which... If I can be honest, was the attitude, and premonition I was having, at the beginning of the project, when these decisions were made.
I find if I'm Producing / Tracking a record, now, to mix ITB - I get a little more bold in the tracking room, I mult LOTS of stuff, and print compressed Snares, Kiks, Room Mic's, and well as I EQ things on the console "To tape (Pro-Tools)" closer to where I'd like them to sit in a mix, rather then "Playing it flat / Safe", and dealing with it later. However I've been putting signal to tape for 30 years, and it's "Evolved to that", and although I know I won't make a ridiculous decision, over eq or squash something, as I listen to it going down, and I STILL always operate with a safety net, by multing, and printing the un effected (Mostly just compressors, unless i want to try some "Bold" EQ' for effect) Tracks. Last few records, I'd print EMT tracks, as well if there were ant Outboard reverbs I liked, Id run sends from the Snare, Toms, even Acoustic Instruments, and vocals, and print those, as tracks to the session. Last 2 records I did that on, I ended up using "Reverb One", McDSP Revolver, and TLSpace for most of it, and those printed FX deleted from the session. I still send things OTB to hardware when Mixing, but I always Print it back in, Just before I close my mix.
__________________
David - MacStudio M1 - HDX II Sonnet xMacStudio - 16x16 HD i/o x 6 - PT ULTIMATE - SONOMA - ProTools Dock / S1 / Control App |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Plugin Reverbs vs Outboard Reverbs
I posted a question about this over on the Gear Slutz forums and nobody ever responded. So maybe somebody can clear something up for me here.
Everybody over there was agreeing that outboard digital reverbs were superior to any plug-ins including Altiverb, TL Space and etc. I don't own any fancy hardware reverbs to really say whether this is true or not. But what I don't get, is why this is the case (if that statement is true). I mean, aren't hardware reverbs basically a small computer running digital reverb emulations? Why would this be so superior to having your main computer run the emulations? Is it that the plug-in algorithms aren't as good as the hardware ones yet?--But have the potential to be just as good or better. I would completely understand if somebody said that an actual reverb plate that they were using for their studio sounded better than their digital reverb plate. But isn't digital reverb, digital reverb whether it is in a reverb module or in a plug-in?
__________________
recording.guru : FREE Pro Tools Tips and 19 Video Basic Training Course Pro Tools HDX 2023.9 Mac Pro 7,1 3.2 GHz 16-Core Xeon W 160 GB RAM macOS 11.7.4 Noisebox Studios -Utah Recording Studio |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Plugin Reverbs vs Outboard Reverbs
TC verbs are same whether you use TDM plug or S6000 hardware. If you use digital connections the algorithm itself is identical. And even analog conversion is superb on that unit, it's hard to tell which is used.
So... Outboard reverb is more complex system than a plugin. You might have AD/DA conversion, you might have less than 24 bit processing, etc. Plugin reveals the true nature of the algorithm, because there is nothing more to it. Just the plug. That said, best plugs sound the best, and best outboard sound the best. Choose what you like and can afford, then go make music :)
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Plugin Reverbs vs Outboard Reverbs
Quote:
Now I own all their irs and that is all I use today. The only reverb plug (non convolution) which I use every now and then is princeton digitals stereo room. Sold all the others from VSS3 to reverb 1.
__________________
2016 MacBook Pro Retina | 16GB RAM | 1TB SSD | OS X Latest - PTHD 12 Latest | 4K LG Thunderbolt Display | Logic Pro 10 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Plugin Reverbs vs Outboard Reverbs
Quote:
So if I understand what you are saying, it sounds like you are saying that the best plug-ins are just as good as the best reverb modules. Correct? It makes the most sense to me. Sure, a flavor of D/A might sound nice, but you could also route a plug-in out of a good D/A and back in again to get something similar. Correct? But if a Module is connected digitally, then there is really no reason that the module would be any different then a plug-in programmed with the same algorithms. I am just trying to understand why people want to spend 10's of $1,000's of dollars on hardware reverbs unless it was really a difference that couldn't be obtained in a plug-in.
__________________
recording.guru : FREE Pro Tools Tips and 19 Video Basic Training Course Pro Tools HDX 2023.9 Mac Pro 7,1 3.2 GHz 16-Core Xeon W 160 GB RAM macOS 11.7.4 Noisebox Studios -Utah Recording Studio |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Plugin Reverbs vs Outboard Reverbs
I had a cool experience with the "lo-fi" reverb that most won't touch even with a stick.. For a fun I loaded the demo song from a PT8 install disc that sounded fantastic to me and the main vocal reverb was... d-verb!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Plugin Reverbs vs Outboard Reverbs
I also really did like the Lexiverb from PT5.. maybe I'm just into shi**y verbs then
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Plugin Reverbs vs Outboard Reverbs
Quote:
I can't really give you the whole reason why! but i have a Lexicon 224 and it just sounds right every-time i use it. mostly on lead vocal and it sounds better than any plugin or Impulse response i've even tried. I also have 2 Eventide DSP4000/4500 SE and those have effects and do stuff that i haven't managed to find on any plugin. their standard reverbs are great and just about the same as any top quality plugin but the other multi-fx are in their own league. Chris
__________________
PT MAC Troubleshooting... http://duc.avid.com/showthread.php?t=54888 Producer, Engineer, UKmastering Mixing & Mastering Blinders_Columbia top 40 UK album charts Slow Readers Club Joy Of The Return #9 UK album charts www.ukmastering.com PT10.3.10 Mountain Lion HD6 accel Magma PE6R4 D Command 32 MacPro 12 Core 3.46ghz UAD-2 Octo x2. Manley Vari-Mu, Manley Massive Passive, SSL VHD, ADL600, Grove Tubes ViPre, Tube-Tech CL-1B. Hafler TRM active monitoring. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Outboard reverbs connected digitally above 48k? | crizdee | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 13 | 02-16-2007 03:32 AM |
IR Reverbs | Larryboy | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 04-04-2005 05:37 PM |
Reverbs? | JaredC | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 4 | 10-09-2003 08:31 AM |
Outboard reverbs | ajazzie | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 18 | 08-07-2002 08:13 PM |
Running outboard reverbs 'live' on mixdown (aux in) then what? Print it at 'the end'? | Jules | Tips & Tricks | 1 | 02-19-2000 05:01 AM |