Avid Pro Audio Community
How to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support
|
|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
#1
06-16-2011, 07:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
RME Fireface UFX
Hi all,
I realise that Pro Tools 9 should work with any ASIO-compliant hardware, but has anyone had any direct experience running PT9 with an RME Fireface UFX on Windows 7? It's time for an upgrade ... Thanks, David 
|
|
#2
06-16-2011, 07:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RME Fireface UFX
Hi,
Not UFX but the fireface 400. Those interfaces really work well on windows 7. I'm using the 64 bit version. I think their is a firewire update or fix you need to install but I never did. I was still able to run at 64 sample buffers with no issues. Totally reliable and stable. I think the largest sessions I mixed where 150 or 160 tracks and more DSP then my HD 3 accel could handle. So the fireface works great. Best
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 002 to New 003 or to RME Fireface UC ? | vlakanas | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 7 | 07-05-2011 08:24 AM |
| PT9 with RME fireface 800 | betojapa | macOS | 5 | 06-16-2011 06:00 AM |
| RME Fireface | L-Dogg | Pro Tools 9 | 5 | 05-15-2011 08:46 AM |
| PT9 and the Fireface UFX | Barry Johns | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 11-04-2010 07:31 PM |
| RME FireFace 800 | Homebelly | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 04-07-2004 05:34 AM |
Linear Mode
