10.3.10 HD and "midi wait for note" bug

[lexx00]

Having a weird "midi wait for note" bug since upgrading to 10.3.10.
First note is never triggered, only the second and after. Always worked fine
until this version. Admin, maybe you can chime in.

10.3.10 HD on Accel
OS 10.8.5
Trashed prefs, etc. Happens with and without latency comp on and different controllers.

[Rubicon]

For me,

The first midi event starts "midi wait for note" but the first midi note I hit is not recorded. Not being able to use "midi wait for note" is killing me.

Please fix this asap....

Rubicon

[JFreak]

I haven't had an issue with "MIDI wsit for note" but instead I've been struggling with MIDI merge issue.

[maxsoundvibe]

Originally Posted by JFreak

I haven't had an issue with "MIDI wsit for note" but instead I've been struggling with MIDI merge issue.

Hi Janne,

are you using pthd10.3.10?

On my system if I start a recording with "wait for note" the first notes trigger the start of the sequence (so it enters the sequencer midi in) but I don't get that recorded on the very start. the rest of the notes are fine. Also the notes on the beginning of the next segment (corresponding to the punch out) are erased.

I have it on this version. on 10.3.8 worked fine.

I trashed the preferences.

M

[maxsoundvibe]

I have this problem too. The first note NEVER gets recorded. And the first note of the next segment gets erased.

I opened a case with support. Waiting to hear from them.

[JFreak]

No, I'm at PT12

[studiojimi]

after reading this i'm wondering if i want to upgrade til this is fixed.

anybody else waiting as well?

[maxsoundvibe]

Originally Posted by JFreak

No, I'm at PT12

I see. I have version 11 also but I have several thousand of $ of plugins that I use that are still not aax and I need to stay in TDM as long I can manage, Also I DO like linear pcm compared to the floating point so I don't see no rush going that fast in the 64 bit new engine (apart from the critical memory issue). I am pretty good with gain staging so I don't really have a problem with the 30 db headroom of my tdm system

But As soon I can spend 10000 + dollars for the Hdx upgrade (plus the plugins extras to upgrade) I will do it. I reaaly can live with high latency and I need to monitor the whole chain (as I do in TDM)

So I hope there will be quick fixes on the 10HD

M

[albee1952]

I never trusted this feature and simply never use it. I leave 2 bars of blank at the front of every session so I can have a 2 bar count-in, in real-time and that way, I never miss the first note(not counting my bad playing).

[maxsoundvibe]

Originally Posted by albee1952

I never trusted this feature and simply never use it. I leave 2 bars of blank at the front of every session so I can have a 2 bar count-in, in real-time and that way, I never miss the first note(not counting my bad playing).

Yeah, this solve part of the problem but if you want to record inserting a punch in you have to play the first notes late enough to be after the downbeat otherways they don't get recorded. I noticed that in version 10.3.9 they fixed a problem with the notes played in the count in that got stacked in the first beat. I believe that is in that very moment they ****ed up the code.

I still believe that for such an expensive program aimed to professional people such a mess must be fixed immediately and resources should be allocated.

It was working fine before so someone did a big mistake and is responsibility of the programming team to solve that. I don't really like that "it's gone now" attitude... I invested lots of money and I have to decide if I want to do so in the future. And now there are alternatives (hardware and software) that can compete... I know that Avid is now more into multimedia movie stuff and Live but still midi was working fine with my Commodore 64 in 1983; should not be difficult to get it right in 2015 with such a supercomputer hardware we all use today. Just go and have a look how was donein version 7.4.2 (midi was very good then). Of course I don't really know what I am saying about programming but I can understand that there mus be a code for that can be compared to see where the mistake was made. Is the midi aware programmer still around ? I've seen a lot of new names in the startup window