|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#101
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Plans for VST Adapter Support in Pro Tools 11
Yep - and they're working just fine here within Metaplugin & HD 10.3.7
I am thankful for this :)
__________________
________________________ www.PlethoraTone.com PlethoraTone Studio Video Tour At PlethoraTone: Mac Mini M1, Avid Carbon, PSP, Waves Mercury, UAD, Kush, Slate Digital, PA, Melodyne, Antares, Audioease, SoundToys |
#102
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Plans for VST Adapter Support in Pro Tools 11
Quote:
As a side not, VOS is a fine example of top notch freeware plug-ins that I wouldn't mind seeing as AAX, or an easier way to get them hosted in PT. Shane
__________________
Pro Tools Power User Editing Give your plug-ins a facelift...and skin 'em! __________________ "Music should be performed by the musician, not by the engineer." Michael Wagener 25th July 2005, 02:59 PM __________________ Pro Tools|HD Native 9.0.1 | Pro Tools|HDX 10.2 | Studio One | REAPER 4.22 | HD OMNI | HoboMac Pro 2.26Ghz Quad-Core | W7 Ultimate 64-bit |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Plans for VST Adapter Support in Pro Tools 11
Quote:
As far as I understand it, that's not so much a case of Q.C. for any specific plug-ins, but of the developer themselves. Much like a job interview, it's a process of elimination, ensuring that any potential developer meets a minimum standard determined by Avid, has the relevant experience in the field, and is capable of supporting their product at a professional level in to the future. Given that Avid fosters close relationships with their development partners, offering support, "developer builds" of Pro Tools, organises developer "kitchens", and can offer gratis complete Pro Tools HDX systems to their development partners, it makes a lot of sense for them to not waste resources on every chancer who fancies taking a punt at writing a plug-in or two. There's no charge for the SDK (assuming you qualify / pass muster), the only charge is for the developer's PACE signature - a fee which is levied by PACE, not Avid. |
#104
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Plans for VST Adapter Support in Pro Tools 11
My impression is that the Pace signature can't possibly be optional for it to be capable of protecting plug-in developers which AFAIK is the whole point of requiring it. Protecting developers is a great way to encourage serious investment in innovation.
I suspect small developers could form alliances that share the cost of a signature although it might involve sending their plug-in code to be compiled on a single computer.
__________________
Bob's room 615 562-4346 Interview Artists are the gatekeepers of truth! - Paul Robeson |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Plans for VST Adapter Support in Pro Tools 11
Quote:
Not sure that it would require compiling on a single nominated computer, but it would mean that developers submitting plug-ins within the alliance, would have to do so under a single brand identity (and perhaps establish a nominal C.E.O.). That's an important distinction from plugin-alliance, which is effectively a union of several distinct brands, each of which requiring their own PACE signature. |
#106
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Plans for VST Adapter Support in Pro Tools 11
I doubt that it has anything to do with brand or anything else outside of simply a traceable source of any code modifications.
__________________
Bob's room 615 562-4346 Interview Artists are the gatekeepers of truth! - Paul Robeson |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Plans for VST Adapter Support in Pro Tools 11
Quote:
And those of us who do maintenance on any type of existing computer code would also love to have that...
__________________
X Note that all opinions, observations, whatever, in this post are mine, unless I'm being mean or am wrong, in which case it's somebody else's fault. I do not work for Avid (their loss)...my only relationship with Avid is that of a customer (when I'm not too poor to buy stuff, like now)...and that hot administrative assistant...that's more of a "thing" than a "relationship" (that should keep them guessing for a while...) Just rockin'...what more is there? Bill in Pittsburgh |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Plans for VST Adapter Support in Pro Tools 11
+1 - completely true. But then again, "Avid hate the people", so it's kind of normal to them.
|
#109
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Plans for VST Adapter Support in Pro Tools 11
I beg your pardon?
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any plans to support AVI in Pro Tools? | pianosdr | Windows | 0 | 12-10-2012 01:53 AM |
Some clarification from Aspera on our DigiDelivery support plans... | cmarkle_aspera | Aspera DigiDelivery | 0 | 12-11-2008 04:15 PM |
Apera- support and maintenance plans | Pirate Post | Aspera DigiDelivery | 10 | 12-06-2008 07:47 AM |
New Support Plans? | krashcreative | Aspera DigiDelivery | 0 | 12-01-2008 06:28 PM |
Fxpansion vst-rtas adapter: no OS9 support! | DClarkson | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 4 | 12-17-2003 10:38 AM |