Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-14-2010, 03:56 PM
yeloop yeloop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 60
Default Latency with the 003 Factory?

Hi Guys,

I'm currently using a Yamaha n12 with Logic Pro 9.

Looking at making the move to ProTools LE after a series of disappointments with Logic...

One of the most important things for me is latency for monitoring, both with effects and without. At the moment I can run straight through my n12 if I need to, for sessions where I need no latency.
On top of that, Logic has incredibly low latency when I want to monitor through Logic, even with quite a few effects running.

My question is... can PT LE run with a low latency (a buffer of say 64 or 32), and allow me to play in real time with lots of effects?

Has anyone moved to or from Logic, who could offer a direct comparison?

Cheers,
Mike
__________________
Mike Pooley (Sydney, Australia)

iMac i7 3.5GHz + RME UFX + Event Opal + Nord Stage 2 + Korg Kronos 73 + Kurzweil PC3-61 + Dave Smith Prophet 08 + Roland Juno 106 + Roland V-Drums TD12 + Yamaha U1 piano

www.thepeopledownstairs.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-14-2010, 05:03 PM
albee1952's Avatar
albee1952 albee1952 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norwich, CT
Posts: 39,332
Default Re: Latency with the 003 Factory?

I record bands at the 64 buffer and have zero complaints about latency, even when the drummer is playing my Roland kit and hearing ezdrummer thru the phones. Don't be confused by the "Factory" nomenclature. All the 003 variants operate the same. The "Factory" bit is simply a package of extra plugins included in the price(if you are still shopping, I would skip the Factory version and put the extra cash toward a good reverb plugin as that is the first thing you will need. The rest of the stock DigiRack plugins work just fine for a lot of stuff, but Dverb is not a good reverb by most opinions. Red112(I think that's what its called), IK Classik and TL Space are all a good step up.
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio
https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works


The better I drink, the more I mix

BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-14-2010, 05:13 PM
yeloop yeloop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 60
Default Re: Latency with the 003 Factory?

Quote:
Originally Posted by albee1952 View Post
I record bands at the 64 buffer and have zero complaints about latency, even when the drummer is playing my Roland kit and hearing ezdrummer thru the phones. Don't be confused by the "Factory" nomenclature. All the 003 variants operate the same. The "Factory" bit is simply a package of extra plugins included in the price(if you are still shopping, I would skip the Factory version and put the extra cash toward a good reverb plugin as that is the first thing you will need. The rest of the stock DigiRack plugins work just fine for a lot of stuff, but Dverb is not a good reverb by most opinions. Red112(I think that's what its called), IK Classik and TL Space are all a good step up.
Hi There,

Thanks for the quick reply!

That's pretty awesome to hear that you can run lots of recording tracks at once at 64.

Would this include running some or all of the tracks being recorded through effects as part of the monitor? (As in plug in effects, virtual instruments, etc?)

When using Cubase briefly (on my Mac Pro), I found that after a few tracks recorded, there was no longer the power to record multiple tracks through effects at a low buffer... I could only go as low as 256, which of course had an unuseable amount of latency!

Moving to PT8 from Logic will be a big step, hence I want to be very sure PT can deliver the low latency of Logic (which is amazing!).

Cheers,
Mike
__________________
Mike Pooley (Sydney, Australia)

iMac i7 3.5GHz + RME UFX + Event Opal + Nord Stage 2 + Korg Kronos 73 + Kurzweil PC3-61 + Dave Smith Prophet 08 + Roland Juno 106 + Roland V-Drums TD12 + Yamaha U1 piano

www.thepeopledownstairs.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-14-2010, 06:55 PM
nst7 nst7 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cincinnati OH
Posts: 9,864
Default Re: Latency with the 003 Factory?

Keep in mind that Protools does not seem to handle virtual instruments as well as Logic (when you start to use more than one or two). You may find that you have to record them to audio as you go along while tracking (to save on CPU). When mixing, you may be able to go back to using the actual VI's again, possibly.

Also, Protools does not have an offline bounce, so when recording VI's to audio tracks it must be done in real time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-14-2010, 07:46 PM
albee1952's Avatar
albee1952 albee1952 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norwich, CT
Posts: 39,332
Default Re: Latency with the 003 Factory?

When I record bands, I generally have up to 16 audio tracks, plus 1 or 2 verbs and maybe a pair of stereo instrument tracks for drums and piano. Also usually have several AUX sends in place to give each player "more me" in their phones.
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio
https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works


The better I drink, the more I mix

BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-15-2010, 02:03 AM
nainesh nainesh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 203
Default Re: Latency with the 003 Factory?

Quote:
Originally Posted by albee1952 View Post
When I record bands, I generally have up to 16 audio tracks, plus 1 or 2 verbs and maybe a pair of stereo instrument tracks for drums and piano. Also usually have several AUX sends in place to give each player "more me" in their phones.
However Albee I thought it might be worth pointing out that you do have a more powerful computer (looking at both your sigs). Also VI's tend to be more demanding in PT than audio.

Mike, I have the same computer spec as you and I love working in Pro Tools. I often run a few virtual instrument instances such as BFD2, some Sampletank instances and a couple of structure instances. On top of this I tend to have a few audio tracks of guitars and vocals. However my system struggles to run at 32/64 buffers especially if I have effects such as TL space and eleven in my session. I tend to track edrums at 32 and a few vi's at 64 but thereafter work mostly at 128.

My worry is that if you have seen Logic cope with your VI demands and are hoping to match it in Pro Tools that you might be disappointed unless you upgrade your system or work using the methods nst7 pointed out.

If you think you might be editing a fair bit of 'audio' as part of your writing, recording process you'll probably love Pro Tools (It's so easy compared to Logic it's ridiculous). If however you are a big VI fan and will have high instance count of these you might want to try and get some hands on use out of PT before you make the leap.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-15-2010, 09:20 AM
albee1952's Avatar
albee1952 albee1952 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norwich, CT
Posts: 39,332
Default Re: Latency with the 003 Factory?

Good point, and since I don't use Logic, I can't really comment on any comparison.
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio
https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works


The better I drink, the more I mix

BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-15-2010, 01:31 PM
jhamrick jhamrick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 153
Default Re: Latency with the 003 Factory?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nainesh View Post

Mike, I have the same computer spec as you and I love working in Pro Tools. I often run a few virtual instrument instances such as BFD2, some Sampletank instances and a couple of structure instances. On top of this I tend to have a few audio tracks of guitars and vocals. However my system struggles to run at 32/64 buffers especially if I have effects such as TL space and eleven in my session. I tend to track edrums at 32 and a few vi's at 64 but thereafter work mostly at 128.
Eleven (RTAS Plug-in) and TL Space eats away at my ability to mult-track at low buffer rates as well.
__________________
-Jesse
___________________________________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-17-2010, 03:13 AM
Carl Fuehrer's Avatar
Carl Fuehrer Carl Fuehrer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,345
Default Re: Latency with the 003 Factory?

I use Redline Reverb and TL Space for nearly all my reverbs.
__________________
Peace,

Carl Fuehrer

Pulsar Audio Lab
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-17-2010, 06:25 AM
albee1952's Avatar
albee1952 albee1952 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norwich, CT
Posts: 39,332
Default Re: Latency with the 003 Factory?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhamrick View Post
Eleven (RTAS Plug-in) and TL Space eats away at my ability to mult-track at low buffer rates as well.
All amp sim plugins are cpu hogs. Its the nature of the beast. For direct recording(or quiet recording) using a POD or an ISO cab are good bets. Palmer makes an excellent direct box/speaker emulator if you can afford it(I think around $600). Or they have one without a load that requires a load(which can be a speaker OR a THD Hot Plate).
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio
https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works


The better I drink, the more I mix

BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
003 Factory Complete and MIDI Latency while recording Oblivion777 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 0 11-09-2010 03:02 AM
003 Factory PTLE Workstation vs 003 Factory Complete De93 General Discussion 11 05-07-2010 05:07 PM
Midi latency 003 Factory PT8 LE welshevo 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 4 07-28-2009 01:37 PM
le factory bundle bomb factory+ plugins... jstimulus 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 07-12-2004 06:52 PM
how to authorise Bomb Factory plugins w/ Factory 001 bundle MGalway 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 4 08-05-2002 10:34 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com