Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-05-2002, 11:27 PM
cuba cuba is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 70
Default Re: any good p4 board here? I\'m confused ...

and question number 3:

what about the giga-byte GA-8IRXP board? how's the 845 chipset compare to the 850?
__________________
cuba
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-06-2002, 12:07 AM
Rock_Artist Rock_Artist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Hertzliya
Posts: 1,482
Default Re: any good p4 board here? I\'m confused ...

ASUS P4T 533Mhz considered a good choice for Pentium based Audio solutions.
__________________
Just wanna do music,
RA.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-06-2002, 12:59 AM
QuikDraw's Avatar
QuikDraw QuikDraw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Azle, Texas, USA
Posts: 2,116
Default Re: any good p4 board here? I\'m confused ...

Quote:
Originally posted by Dreamware:
Contrary to what people say. Installing the latest intel chipset drivers and application accelerator of www.intel.com is essential. Benchmarks have cleary proven that the Intel Application Accelerator is optimized for the Pentiums 4's data prefetching feature, which essentially anticipates which bits of data the CPU is likely to request next, and then transfers the data into cache before the processor actually requests it.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Okay Alex, explain yourself. You say that the Intel chipset drivers AND Application Accelerator are essential. What makes you feel this way?

Once again (I've done this a few times now since I got this motherboard) I installed both the chipset drivers and Application Accelerator. The latest versions of both just downloaded tonight from Intel.com. I did some tests after the chipset driver install. No change in system performance or behavior. Then I loaded Application Accelerator. There was almost no difference, but my PTLE performance actually decreased according to the DaveC test. Using WinXP System Restore I put my system back the way it was before the installations and retested. My PTLE performance came back to normal.

What does Application Accelerator have to do with prefetching data for the P4 cache? It's a software IDE caching program according to Intel's Readme. What does IDE caching have to do with the CPU prefetching data? Other than possibly improving disk read performance from Intel IDE controllers (which I don't use with PTLE on this system, my HDDs are on Promise controllers) it can't improve P4 performance!

The chipset drivers are supposed to update USB, AGP, IDE and PCI drivers. All these are built into Windows and work just fine! As a matter of fact, the 845 chipset drivers built into WinXP are exactly the same ones that I just downloaded. Same file versions and dates. Why is this essential to install? It's already installed automatically with the OS!

Tell me Alex... Why do you feel that these installations are essential? Why? What problems does it solve? What applications show improved performance? Does it affect PTLE performance in a measurable way? Say, an improved DaveC test score?

I must know where you get the idea that these installations are helpful, or as you say essential.

Benchmarks are designed to sell hardware and software to people that are impressed by numbers on a graph. Rarely do benchmarks translate to real-world performance. I don't care if a benchmark shows my harddrive could be 10ns faster on multiple reads of the same sector! I care if it'll get me another track in PTLE or if I can run more plug-ins. That ain't happenin' man!

[img]images/icons/shocked.gif[/img]

Mike
__________________
-- Mike
- HP Spectre x360 Convertible 14t-ea100 - 2.9 GHz (5.0 Max Turbo) i7-1195G7 32GB RAM, OLED 3k x 2k, Iris Xe Onboard Graphics
- Windows 11 - PT 2021.12
- PreSonus Quantum 2 - PreSonus Studio 24c - Mackie Onyx 1640i
- Samsung T3 and T5 SSDs - Various USB2/3 and Firewire HDDs
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-06-2002, 03:15 PM
Dreamware Dreamware is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 484
Default Re: any good p4 board here? I\'m confused ...

In our test we have found track counts to increase after installing the intel chipset drivers and application accelerator. However, they must be installed in a certain order after a clean install to work properly.
__________________
Alex

www.dreamware.ca
Have something to brag about...Own a Dreamware Audio PC...

My Rig:

AMD Athlon XP 1700+
512MB PC2700C2 Corsair
MSI KT3ULTRA ARU
2x 80GB Seagate Barracuda 4 in RAID 0
GeForce 2 Ti 64MB
Lite-On 40x12x40 CD-RW
16x Pioneer DVD
Intel Pro/100 +
SB Audigy
Digi 001
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lots of plugins Ilok TDM/RTAS/AAX/VST/AU (good ones for a good price) usastra Buy & Sell 19 02-18-2013 10:46 AM
:confused: Confused Re: Expansion Chasis BA Studios 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 02-26-2008 08:24 AM
BOARD TECH NEEDED to service Amek Matchless board audio[LAB] General Discussion 4 01-31-2007 11:17 AM
Grid use, one hits and time stretching, also good sites for good one hit sample compblue 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 0 02-05-2003 12:16 AM
Good guitar effects board Da Gatekeepa 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 11 06-04-2002 09:46 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:59 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com