Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Post Production > Post - Surround - Video
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-2019, 07:55 PM
Michael Carnes's Avatar
Michael Carnes Michael Carnes is offline
Development Partner
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Salt Lake Valley
Posts: 262
Default Atmos Production Suite: Bugs or expected behavior?

Hi folks,
I've recently begun some experiments with the Atmos Production Suite (software renderer). As far as I can tell, I'm fully up-to-date with V3.0.2 of the renderer and PT 2019.5. I'm bumping into some behaviors I didn't expect and I think it's wrong. Whether to attribute this to Dolby or Avid is another question. For now, I'm just trying to determine if this is known.

The most obvious issue is that track mute doesn't appear to work when a track is assigned to an object. I do know the tracks are properly attached to objects: they show up in the Dolby monitor, pan properly and so on. If they're in the bed, mutes work. As soon as they become objects, the mute doesn't work.

The second issue is that sends (reverb, fx sends, etc) don't seem to work when a track is attached to an object. Again, if it goes to the bed the audio goes to the aux sends and is picked up by aux inputs. But when the track is attached to an object the send dries right up.

Does this ring any bells anywhere?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-11-2019, 07:30 AM
Michael Carnes's Avatar
Michael Carnes Michael Carnes is offline
Development Partner
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Salt Lake Valley
Posts: 262
Default Re: Atmos Production Suite: Bugs or expected behavior?

Dang! Found the answer deep in a Dolby forum. The Atmos send is pre-everything, so nothing else in the track (plugs, sends, etc) is part of the chain. I can work around it, but it sure makes things more 'interesting'
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2019, 03:17 PM
paulo m's Avatar
paulo m paulo m is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 421
Default Re: Atmos Production Suite: Bugs or expected behavior?

To a certain extent, I can accept the Sends issue, but plugins inserted on a track that is an object is out of my understanding...

I guess that unless you have a RMU (and pay the ripoff price for it), things are not easy as they should be...
__________________
Regards,

Paulo M

MAC Studio MAX M1_64 GB RAM_1TB SSD_MAC OS Ventura

Protools Studio 2024.3
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2019, 07:54 PM
Michael Carnes's Avatar
Michael Carnes Michael Carnes is offline
Development Partner
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Salt Lake Valley
Posts: 262
Default Re: Atmos Production Suite: Bugs or expected behavior?

Quote:
Originally Posted by paulo m View Post
To a certain extent, I can accept the Sends issue, but plugins inserted on a track that is an object is out of my understanding...

I guess that unless you have a RMU (and pay the ripoff price for it), things are not easy as they should be...
I'm working through it. By all appearances, the render send plugin causes everything in the channel to head straight to the renderer. The order of plugins in the channel doesn't seem to make any difference.

I'm coming up with a workflow that's starting to make some sense. For each channel, it requires one extra bus and two aux channels (details later on if anybody's interested. But some of it has to do with my notions of accurate reverb). I'm really glad the old restrictions on bus and aux counts have gone away.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2019, 10:29 PM
reichman's Avatar
reichman reichman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 2,412
Default Re: Atmos Production Suite: Bugs or expected behavior?

Hello Exponential:

Something is wrong with your setup. You can definitely use plug-ins and sends on object tracks. Seems to me like you might be putting the Dolby Atmos sends on the audio track. They're not meant to be there. Check out the Dolby templates. The intended design is to use audio tracks that route to mono auxes that have the sends there. These auxes have Pro Tools outputs that go nowhere because the send is delivering to the Renderer. In object mode, sound flows to the aux. In bed mode, sound goes to a 7.1.2 aux with a send to the first ten inputs.

And, the above paragraph refers to the Send/Return mode in DAPS. See my other thread about this mode vs. Dolby Audio Bridge.
__________________
Nathaniel Reichman
Producer/Re-recording Mixer - New York
Nathaniel Reichman | IMDB | LinkedIn
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dolby Atmos Production Suite renderer on another computer nedd Post - Surround - Video 7 04-24-2019 08:11 AM
Dolby Atmos Production Suite Installer V 2.5 tatoflores Post - Surround - Video 1 04-21-2019 09:46 AM
Dolby Atmos Production Suite garnoil Post - Surround - Video 2 03-13-2019 08:34 AM
Dolby Atmos Production Suite subhuffer Post - Surround - Video 20 03-10-2019 06:40 AM
Dolby Atmos Speaker Snap not working using Production Suite jamesa5454 Post - Surround - Video 3 11-02-2017 02:54 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:20 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com