|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
using protools without 002 attached
Hi! Is it possible to use the protools software to edit and playback when the digirack is not connected to the computer?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: using protools without 002 attached
No.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: using protools without 002 attached
Quote:
You were suppose to say a long time ago it was not possible but NOW you can add the amazing mBox Micro and accomplish that task. Seriously though mcclark you can run without the 002 but you have to attach the Micro to do it. It allows you to open/edit/playback but not record. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: using protools without 002 attached
Or, you could add a few years of history to that promo speech and say, "Back in the day, you COULD run Pro Tools without an interface attached, in a mode known as DAE Powermix. But that went the way of non-realtime bouncing and (insert extinct animal here) with the arrival of v5."
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: using protools without 002 attached
Quote:
That's definitely a system known only in the history archives now. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: using protools without 002 attached
That system is more like a Way back in the day. That's definitely a system known only in the history archives now.
True true. Just interesting that those features WERE there (along with a SMPTE timeline...and then they vanished!...only to reappear as purchasable options [DV Toolkit...MBox Micro (a small interface that removes the need for a BIGGER one)... Also it was limited to 44.1 kHz With the processors of the day, sure. I'm sure today's version would be 'limited' to 96kHz. And in case anyone feels like saying, "If you don't like ProTools, go use another program", don't bother. I love ProTools, AND I'm working on other programs to do the things I can't do in it (surround mixing, non realtime bouncing (for stuff like 9-hour audiobooks). I just wish I didn't have to spread myself around different programs is all. It's a love thing. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: using protools without 002 attached
Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: using protools without 002 attached
Y'all are making me feel old.
__________________
It all clicks and buzzes from over here! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: using protools without 002 attached
There was nothing wrong back then with 44/16.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do I need the Hardware attached to use ProTools SE? | lifeisacabaret | Pro Tools SE and Essential (Mac) | 0 | 10-21-2012 01:30 PM |
Unable to work on Protools LE 8 with attached LaCie Rugged Safe Portable Drive | ashishv_26 | Storage Subsystems | 6 | 02-23-2012 10:44 AM |
ProTools User Wishlist / Shortcut for Selecting attached regions? | Arya44 | Tips & Tricks | 2 | 09-20-2009 06:48 AM |
Can you start Protools with out the interface being attached | theboogins | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 8 | 07-23-2007 07:32 PM |
Protools LE without needing interface attached? | jccrtv | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 5 | 03-16-2005 04:57 PM |