|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring through headphones with Apollo 8 - when selecting Low Latency Monitoring
Hi. I apologise if this is a stupid question (in other words - I am just missing something obvious) but I have a question with regards to monitoring through headphones, using Universal Audio Apollo:
My issue is that I send a headphone mix to a bus, to an aux track, so monitor through that aux output, rather than directly through the Apollo. This is perfect APART FROM when I arm that specific track for recording: as I have it set to Low Latency Monitoring then it automatically mutes the send, so (for example) the singer can no longer hear that particular track when singing through the headphones. Can anyone please give me guidance? Or is the answer to use the Apollo console for headphone mix? I’d really appreciate some help here! Thanks, Mick.
__________________
Pro Tools 2020 Mac Mojave Mac Pro (canister type) Twin Xeon processors 64GB DRAM Apollo Quad + satellite Multiple Enterprise class SSDs (mixed use endurance) Solid State Logic Nucleus. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Monitoring through headphones with Apollo 8 - when selecting Low Latency Monitori
Sends will always be muted by LLM. If you don't like that, you must find a work-around that works better for you.
I like to make my headphone mixes in PT rather than in Console, because I have more outputs available and because that way I don't have to make two mixes. However, I found that even with a blazing fast computer, using PT Native (non-HD), it is impossible to have latency low enough for me to be happy with the sound in the cans during tracking. I got it down to 4.5ms, but I could still hear a significant comb filtering effect. So, I will stick with direct monitoring through Apollo. When monitoring new tracks that are being recorded along with old backing tracks that were pre-recorded, we end up using both the headphone mix in PT (for the old tracks) and the headphone mix in Console (for the new tracks). This means you have to manually keep the levels the same between the headphone mixes and control room mixes for both applications. Major pain in the ass, but it's the only way I can work until I can afford PTHD. I tried working with 2ms latency (monitoring through Console at 48k) and it still felt too much. I am only happy with 1ms latency or less (monitoring through Console at 96k). EDIT: Remember, it's not the latency that's a problem - it's the comb filtering caused by the latency. So when people tell you "Oh God nobody can even hear latency less than 5ms," they're right but they're wrong - you won't hear timing differences, but you'll hear quite drastic frequency response differences. Last edited by chrismeraz; 04-10-2018 at 11:38 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Monitoring through headphones with Apollo 8 - when selecting Low Latency Monitori
And, monitoring thru the Apollo window is probably the only way to work WITH active UA plugins
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works The better I drink, the more I mix BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apollo Firewire and Pro Tools 12 Monitoring Problem | spock999 | Pro Tools 12 | 7 | 04-18-2017 05:26 AM |
monitoring w/headphones | quaintbs | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 1 | 01-19-2006 07:09 PM |
Headphones for monitoring mixes | dividedsci | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 4 | 11-11-2005 03:40 PM |
BEST headphones for monitoring???!!! | Anotherstate | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 19 | 10-18-2005 03:47 AM |
Headphones for nonsoftware monitoring | dogen | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 4 | 01-23-2001 02:39 PM |