Sub-mixes can work! New songs with 001

[six mile hill]

professor m,

Actually, I had to tweek quite frequently. It is true that some quality is lost once you bounce to disk, so adjusting levels and pans became a task.

At times (depending on what track I was adjusting) I had to re-work one mix, bounce to disk, then open my other session, bounce to disk again (so I would have the adjustments in my "master" session.

Of course this isn't the prime condition one wants to work in... but for under a $1000.00 I didn't mind the additional attention (and work).

My biggest problem is that I AM VERY STUBBORN and would spend many a late night tweeking the slightest bit (just ask Kenny - my band mate)!!

[Karrot24]

Thanks Todd...Good readin' its givin me some good ideas in terms of 001....Once again I've enjoyed your music ...Best Of Luck...Thanks again for takin' the time

[dayz]

You shouldn't use Xing to encode your Mp3s. It's a very bad encoder.

Try http://www.musicmatch.com/ basic. There's also a version for the Mac. But don't encode with Normal Quality, because the codec used for the "Normal" setting has a bug!

For more information on this topic you should visit http://fastforward.iwarp.com/cbr128.html

I hope you can use it!

dayz

[six mile hill]

Thanks dayz,

I'm going to look into it.

[six mile hill]

dayz,

After checking out the mp3 article, I went and purchased musicmatch 6.0. I didn't even know that there could be audible differences in the encoding (I should have though!).

I intend on converting the songs with this software and then re-posting them on mp3.com...

[dayz]

I'm glad the link was useful to you!

dayz

[six mile hill]

dayz,

I found MusicMatch to be fantastic. I thank you for your info (in fact, I'm going to post a new topic about mp3 conversion).

Thanks again!!

Todd