Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-03-2004, 02:58 PM
Tedmod Tedmod is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 64
Default Anybody using the reverse level approach?

How effective is the reverse feder leveling approach when fixing levels in mixing?

The standard in most mixing handbooks is to set all faders to nil and slowly "Bring it up".
According to this approach, Faders shoudl be all the way up and then slowly "Brought down" to taste. with the master fader at unity gain.
and the monitor volume is set in a way not to burst the magnets out of the cones, I see some sense in this approach. Any opinions?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-03-2004, 07:50 PM
pk_hat pk_hat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: grimy Brooklyn
Posts: 4,680
Default Re: Anybody using the reverse level approach?

I don't know, but personally, I don't think I'd be comfortable working that way. I'm all for subtractive eq, subtractive arranging, but for mixing, I think I prefer the age-old additive method. I don't think I could make sound decisions (ahem...) hearing everything all at once and then trying to figure exactly where my kick drum or bass line should wedge itself against the rest.

I think half the fun of mixing is creating the energy and dynamics needed for the song, which imo, comes by adding things slowly and creating a synergy. If all the $#!t's playing at the same time all at once right from the start, I'd lose perspective on what needs to be emphasized, I'd lose sense of what subtleties I can bring to the mix.

Interesting subject nonetheless...
__________________
www.myspace.com/krou
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-03-2004, 09:48 PM
p.markham p.markham is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 17
Default Re: Anybody using the reverse level approach?

Boy I sure do use this method! Fire up all the tracks at unity and then balance them out so you can hear everything in a nice blend. I honestly thought this was how one does this. You mean it's not? lol!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-04-2004, 04:16 AM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,901
Default Re: Anybody using the reverse level approach?

i've found that this method leads to keeping almost all faders on the plus side, as the additive method is psychologically easier to do. in theory this will eat headroom and lead to distortion at some point. if you don't want to start from silence, i'd suggest you set all your track faders to -10 instead of unity - and keep the master faders at unity if there is no justified reason to do otherwise.
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-04-2004, 06:18 AM
where02190 where02190 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boston, Ma USA
Posts: 8,145
Default Re: Anybody using the reverse level approach?

Typically I put all tracks at -10 and start from there, typically concentrating on lowering what I have too much of, (akin to subtractive eqing). Putting all the faders at 0, unless you record absurdly low, sill result in redlining the master fader most likely.

And I agreee, keep that master fader at 0.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what would be your approach??? mykhal c 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 3 07-09-2008 11:17 PM
Film 5.1 - what's the best approach ? Nils Groth Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 0 03-16-2007 04:01 PM
Testing PT 7 - Best Approach Howardk Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 5 11-05-2005 12:45 AM
How would you approach this? phaseout 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 0 12-24-2002 04:43 PM
CPU upgrade vs new Mac: my approach DonaldR General Discussion 1 05-03-2001 06:14 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:36 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com