Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-15-2005, 05:12 PM
MunchieLad MunchieLad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 62
Default anything faster than bounce?

hi everyone,
I'm sorry if this has been asked before. i couldn't find a clear answer in the archives.
I have four one-hour tv shows mixed into 5 track stems (narration, dialog, mono fx, st. music) there is very little automation and no plugins, just 5 tracks of audio. I need to export them as stereo files or dual mono in order to give to the online studio for layback. and i'm wondering if I can do this faster than real time. I should know this but i'm not sure. I really don't have time to wait for it to process in real time. can i do this with export? or any other way?
thanks alot all.
Munchie
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-15-2005, 05:41 PM
Phil Jeffers Phil Jeffers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: anything faster than bounce?

In order for you to combine the stems, you will need to bounce, in real time. Pain eh?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-15-2005, 06:36 PM
lasertagnate lasertagnate is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2
Default Re: anything faster than bounce?

this only works with mono/stereo but if you highlight a track or region you can "export selected as files" from the audio button above the regions list on the right while in the edit window. you can choose to export them as 44.1 16bit aiff files... much faster than bouncing.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-15-2005, 07:57 PM
Slim Shady Slim Shady is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 7,527
Default Re: anything faster than bounce?

Quote:
this only works with mono/stereo but if you highlight a track or region you can "export selected as files" from the audio button above the regions list on the right while in the edit window. you can choose to export them as 44.1 16bit aiff files... much faster than bouncing.

True that, but doing so will ignore any automation on the tracks. Our poster mentioned that he has automation, and in that situation you must use bounce to disk .
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-15-2005, 08:05 PM
MunchieLad MunchieLad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 62
Default Re: anything faster than bounce?

oh well,
thanks everyone. i though so. i have to playback the final episode tomorrow and then go and make bounces of the stereo mixes and M+E mixes, and maybe a mono mix too. all by tomorrow night. i just didn't want to be there until 3 in the morning since i'm flying away on saturday. iam i crazy, or do i remember an old version of pro tools free that wuold bounce faster than real time?
thanks again for your responses
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-15-2005, 08:27 PM
Phil Jeffers Phil Jeffers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: anything faster than bounce?

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

this only works with mono/stereo but if you highlight a track or region you can "export selected as files" from the audio button above the regions list on the right while in the edit window. you can choose to export them as 44.1 16bit aiff files... much faster than bouncing.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



True that, but doing so will ignore any automation on the tracks. Our poster mentioned that he has automation, and in that situation you must use bounce to disk .


Not to mention combining 5 tracks to 2...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-15-2005, 08:30 PM
Phil Jeffers Phil Jeffers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: anything faster than bounce?

Quote:
oh well,
thanks everyone. i though so. i have to playback the final episode tomorrow and then go and make bounces of the stereo mixes and M+E mixes, and maybe a mono mix too. all by tomorrow night. i just didn't want to be there until 3 in the morning since i'm flying away on saturday. iam i crazy, or do i remember an old version of pro tools free that wuold bounce faster than real time?
thanks again for your responses
Ah, deliveries. A feature can have deliveries that go over an entire week... yes, in real time.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-16-2005, 05:31 AM
RadioMoo RadioMoo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 628
Default Re: anything faster than bounce?

Quote:
True that, but doing so will ignore any automation on the tracks. Our poster mentioned that he has automation, and in that situation you must use bounce to disk .
Consolidating the track will let you "Export Selected As" with automation; unfortunately that doesn't apply to this poster's situation.

Quote:
iam i crazy, or do i remember an old version of pro tools free that wuold bounce faster than real time?
Not sure about PT Free, but past versions of PT in general allowed for a fast bounce.
__________________
Mbox 1 w/BLA mod, PTLE 6.1, eMac 700MHz, OS X (10.2.8), 1024 MB RAM
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-16-2005, 07:43 AM
ellmanl ellmanl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: brooklyn, ny
Posts: 34
Default Re: anything faster than bounce?

You probably know this: but just in case you were going to bouce 5 times for each episode.

If you have enough tracks left, send the output of your stems to new stereo input tracks. You would need 10 (if you have 5 stems). Record one pass and you'll have complete stereo files for each stem. Just grab them from your audio folder and send them to the client. Film / video folks can usually deal with dual mono at various sample rates. If they dont want that - you can use a program like Peak to convert them to stereo interleaved 16/44 or 16/48 fo Final Cut Pro users.
__________________
HD Native PT10/11
HD i/o, Apogee, Coleman Audio, Genelec, ProAc, Phoenix Audio, Manley, Drawmer, Pendilum Audio, Bricasti, Chandler, A Designs, Neotek, Cables, Screws, Socks.
Quad 2.8 x 2 Intel Mac OSX 10.8.5
12 Gb ram
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-16-2005, 07:45 AM
Windshore Windshore is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 157
Default Re: anything faster than bounce?

2 possibilities....
I haven't tried this for more than 1 file, so correct me if it can't be done. It also might take more time than 5 realtime bounces, but might have advantages.

insert a send in each track that will be part of the first stem (say you have 4 tracks for that stem, insert sends to bus 9-10 on all)
Set up a new Audio channel for Stem 1 with input set to that bus (9-10)
Repeat for the other 4 stems.
Record the "Stem Audio Tracks" in real time. (outputs muted)

I think this would work and might have the advantage that once it's setup, you can make changes and new stems quickly.

My other suggestion:
Use Logic, you don't have to bounce in real time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
faster mp3 bounce?? popear 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 4 09-21-2007 05:55 AM
Bounce to disk (faster?) Maca 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 13 07-14-2004 07:35 AM
Faster way to bounce? msawitzke 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 35 07-07-2004 04:03 PM
faster bounce Pol Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 2 02-01-2003 12:15 AM
Faster Processor=Faster Bounce??? smashannon Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 8 08-28-2000 10:36 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:37 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com