Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > macOS
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-01-2011, 03:58 AM
GordonFreeman GordonFreeman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In Hell
Posts: 455
Default Ideas about the most stable interface for PT 9?

Hey! I'm a composer with a small project studio. A while ago, I moved from an MBox 2, into an 003 Rack, to run away from USB in a time when the MBox caused kernel panics in Mac OS X. This issue was solved by Avid with a driver update, but only after I bought a used 003 Rack on craigslist Then, the 003 brought me more problems: power cycling issues that hang PT and force me to restart the computer, everytime I forget to reboot the 003 every 20 hours. Booting up an 003, with the clackitty clicks, feels like waiting for tubes to warmup in an old radio Right now I'm typing this message with PT off, because since the 003 lost power while a session was open, now everytime I open a session, it won't play by pressing space bar. I probably have to reboot the Mac again.

This brings me to my question: now that Pro Tools 9 supports tons of interfaces, would it do any good to get a PCI interface inside this mac, like an Audiophile 192?
Would I be less troubled with random power issues and error messages?

I'm asking because I remember reading here about performance differences between USB and Firewire, and someone mentioned that the reason why HD (and the old Digi 001) seemed to run with less trouble than the new toys, was because the connection was PCI, not through a FW/USB bus. Valid question? Tell me your thoughts, folks!
__________________
Software:
Pro Tools 10.3.1, OS X 10.6.8;
Computer Hardware:
Mac Pro Quad 2.66, 20 GB RAM;
Audio/MIDI Hardware:
RME Fireface UC, M-Audio Keystation 88es + Akai LPK25 (USB);
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-01-2011, 05:36 AM
tamasdragon tamasdragon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hungary
Posts: 2,190
Default Re: Ideas about the most stable interface for PT 9?

We've got sucess with rme interfaces. Even with the latest ones like ufx, etc. Stability with rme is really top notch.
__________________
my blog:Tamas Dragon
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-01-2011, 05:54 AM
GordonFreeman GordonFreeman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In Hell
Posts: 455
Default Re: Ideas about the most stable interface for PT 9?

You're right, and RME seems to be one of the lowest budget options - apparently these new Mac Pros don't have PCI slots, only PCIe. And considering E-MU cards are PC only, I'd have to go with RME, or maybe a MOTU 2408 Core MkIII PCIe, which goes for about $1000.

I'd love to try it first though, and see if it's worth the money. If it is, I'll sell all my LE interfaces, probably at a loss now that PT 9 is out

Still, I'd like to hear more PCIe vs FW stories. It makes logical sense for PCIe to be better, but nowadays firewire is so impossibly popular that it must have been improved. Any workarounds or pirate drivers to "revive" a glitchy, clicky 003 rack that needs a post-it saying "reboot before starting pro tools"? lol. Sorry for venting, but I get tired of pro tools stalling on boot with weird error messages due to FW. When it happens, I know I'll be spending the next 10-20 minutes rebooting or troubleshooting instead of making music.
__________________
Software:
Pro Tools 10.3.1, OS X 10.6.8;
Computer Hardware:
Mac Pro Quad 2.66, 20 GB RAM;
Audio/MIDI Hardware:
RME Fireface UC, M-Audio Keystation 88es + Akai LPK25 (USB);
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-01-2011, 10:22 AM
Carl Lie Carl Lie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,310
Default Re: Ideas about the most stable interface for PT 9?

I just switched from an Apogee Duet/Mac Optical aggregate device to an RME PCie interface. Major difference in stability.

I did this for the very reason you bring up and it paid off however I don't know if it's just that RME writes better drivers or PCIe is more effective.

My guess is its a little of both

Carl
__________________
PT 2021.10 HDX 16x24 -Mac Pro 12 Cores 48 GB RAM OS 10.13.6 - API 16 channel - AMS Neve 16 channel, AMS-Neve-SSL -Pres/Processing, Bock Audio, BLUE Bottle, Neumann, Josephson -Mics, Bogner, Kemper- Guitar, Chandler Zener-Curve Bender Outboard/Master. UAudio, Waves, Plugin Alliance etc.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-01-2011, 12:11 PM
Goldencd Goldencd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 104
Default Re: Ideas about the most stable interface for PT 9?

Any Pcie connection will be better.

I run a apogee symphony 32 pcie card with a rosetta 800 and it is rock solid.
__________________
GoodLook Ent.
Mac Pro quad 2.66 (2010) - OSX 10.6.5 - 4g ram - Apogee Rosetta 800 - xHD - Neumanm Tlm 49 - Great River 500nv - LA2A - Protools 9HD
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-01-2011, 12:32 PM
GordonFreeman GordonFreeman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In Hell
Posts: 455
Default Re: Ideas about the most stable interface for PT 9?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Lie View Post
I just switched from an Apogee Duet/Mac Optical aggregate device to an RME PCie interface. Major difference in stability.

I did this for the very reason you bring up and it paid off however I don't know if it's just that RME writes better drivers or PCIe is more effective.

My guess is its a little of both

Carl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldencd View Post
Any Pcie connection will be better.

I run a apogee symphony 32 pcie card with a rosetta 800 and it is rock solid.
That's great to know. After some research, I'm actually wondering about the MOTU 2408 Core MkIII PCIe. Seems to be an amazing piece of hardware, especially for the price (under $1k). RME or Apogee solutions usually start at $2k or more, it seems.
__________________
Software:
Pro Tools 10.3.1, OS X 10.6.8;
Computer Hardware:
Mac Pro Quad 2.66, 20 GB RAM;
Audio/MIDI Hardware:
RME Fireface UC, M-Audio Keystation 88es + Akai LPK25 (USB);
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-01-2011, 12:58 PM
getz76 getz76 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,491
Default Re: Ideas about the most stable interface for PT 9?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GordonFreeman View Post
I'm actually wondering about the MOTU 2408 Core MkIII PCIe. Seems to be an amazing piece of hardware, especially for the price (under $1k). RME or Apogee solutions usually start at $2k or more, it seems.
MOTU makes some nice stuff. None of it will knock your socks off when you compare it to very high-end gear, but I think they occupy a space between the bargain and the high-end that does not have that much direct competition at their price points.

MOTU makes great drivers for Mac OS X. They have been doing it for a long time. When I had my issues with the 828mkII, it was down to the drivers for Windows XP at the time (actually, with my Firewire controller in my Windows machine).

If the 2408 meets your input/output needs, it's worth a punt. Hard to go wrong for that kind of money.
__________________
| Logic Pro 9 | Reason 6.5 | Pro Tools 10 | MOTU UltraLite mk3 | RME ADI-2 | Summit Audio 2BA-221 x 2 | MOTU 8pre x 2 |
| Mac Pro (4,1) 2.26gHz Xeon x 2 16gB OS X 10.7.4 | Macbook Pro (8,2) 2.2gHz i7 Quad 16gB OS X 10.7.4 |
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2011, 01:04 PM
GordonFreeman GordonFreeman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In Hell
Posts: 455
Default Re: Ideas about the most stable interface for PT 9?

Quote:
Originally Posted by getz76 View Post
MOTU makes some nice stuff. None of it will knock your socks off when you compare it to very high-end gear, but I think they occupy a space between the bargain and the high-end that does not have that much direct competition at their price points.

MOTU makes great drivers for Mac OS X. They have been doing it for a long time. When I had my issues with the 828mkII, it was down to the drivers for Windows XP at the time (actually, with my Firewire controller in my Windows machine).

If the 2408 meets your input/output needs, it's worth a punt. Hard to go wrong for that kind of money.
Exactly, heard great things about MOTUs Mac drivers as well, and I don't care about I/O, I just need a couple of inputs and 2 outs, honestly. I do everything in the box and the max channels I'd use is 8 to record maybe a drum set.

I'm wondering about the 2408 converters, compared to 003 Rs. But even if they're a step down, I'd probably be happier - it REALLY annoys me to have an unstable FW/USB studio, and I have anxiety, so it's not good for my stress levels, and it's not good for my creativity, because I end up avoiding PT altogether, subconsciously
__________________
Software:
Pro Tools 10.3.1, OS X 10.6.8;
Computer Hardware:
Mac Pro Quad 2.66, 20 GB RAM;
Audio/MIDI Hardware:
RME Fireface UC, M-Audio Keystation 88es + Akai LPK25 (USB);
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-01-2011, 01:21 PM
getz76 getz76 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,491
Default Re: Ideas about the most stable interface for PT 9?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GordonFreeman View Post
I'm wondering about the 2408 converters, compared to 003 Rs. But even if they're a step down
I don't think they'll be a set down. I don't think you will hear a significant difference, actually.

I have never had any issue with my 003R. I also have a Mbox 2 and I have never had any issue.
__________________
| Logic Pro 9 | Reason 6.5 | Pro Tools 10 | MOTU UltraLite mk3 | RME ADI-2 | Summit Audio 2BA-221 x 2 | MOTU 8pre x 2 |
| Mac Pro (4,1) 2.26gHz Xeon x 2 16gB OS X 10.7.4 | Macbook Pro (8,2) 2.2gHz i7 Quad 16gB OS X 10.7.4 |
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-01-2011, 01:28 PM
GordonFreeman GordonFreeman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In Hell
Posts: 455
Default Re: Ideas about the most stable interface for PT 9?

Quote:
Originally Posted by getz76 View Post
I don't think they'll be a set down. I don't think you will hear a significant difference, actually.

I have never had any issue with my 003R. I also have a Mbox 2 and I have never had any issue.
Yeah probably not, they seem to be on a similar level.

I have tons of issues with my MBox 2 (kernel panics, power loss), and now with the 003 R it's actually even worse - There's at least a 60% possibility that if I start pro tools right now, the 003 will start clicking repeatedly, and the software will spit out an error. I spent more time yesterday rebooting my Mac, 003 and re-checking connections than actually working. I just want always-on, rock solid stability so I can start it up anytime and know PT will work, at least 90% of the time :) And unfortunately I've spent some money upgrading interfaces, but it wasn't enough.
__________________
Software:
Pro Tools 10.3.1, OS X 10.6.8;
Computer Hardware:
Mac Pro Quad 2.66, 20 GB RAM;
Audio/MIDI Hardware:
RME Fireface UC, M-Audio Keystation 88es + Akai LPK25 (USB);
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stable usb or firewire audio interface for windows 7 32bit PaoloMasoni FireWire & USB Audio Interfaces (Win) 1 06-27-2013 09:11 AM
Can someone please recomend me a stable and affordable interface dope5050 Pro Tools 10 6 02-03-2013 09:45 PM
Digital noise on 192 interface.....anyone ideas? 2fly Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 2 09-28-2004 03:59 AM
Interface Error -9356 (the connection is not stable) rough 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 0 08-18-2002 10:07 PM
Interface error..any ideas? Marc@SGR Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 1 10-14-1999 10:38 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:23 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com