Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2001, 07:48 AM
tommydee tommydee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Washington Heights, New York
Posts: 528
Default Native Instruments: Direct Connect versus RTAS??

i've noticed that NI is releasing some new "Pro Tools Edition" versions of their soft-synths.

they say they integrate "seamlessly" into PT via RTAS or HTDM. (So that's RTAS for us 001-heads.)

that said, the soon-to-be-released PT Edition synths are more expensive than the synths you can currently purchase...

so, does anyone know if/how these newer synths differ to those already on the shelves?

is RTAS a better way to connect than Direct Connect?

if anyone has any experience with RTAS synths and/or Direct Connect synths, i'd love to hear your 2c.

('cause if Direct Connect works fine, i won't shell out the extra for the RTAS version...)

peace,

t.d.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-27-2001, 12:46 AM
s.d. finley s.d. finley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Houston, TX. USA
Posts: 1,679
Default Re: Native Instruments: Direct Connect versus RTAS??

Hey Tommy, i would figure that the RTAS versions would be much better that the DC.
Pure speculation, my reasoning would be the synth or whatever would be like a plug in, it would automatically work in the sense of the two, rtas synth plug and ptle, no iac bus bullcrap, maybe better timing, less cpu overhead, no jumping back between the 2 apps, since thr RTAS synth would be working inside the pt envirorment, just like a EQ RTAS plug in would.
At least i hope! [img]images/icons/cool.gif[/img] Some one buy one of these buggers and let us know what da dang deal is.

sdf
__________________
sdf

www.sugarhillstudios713.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-27-2001, 07:04 AM
tommydee tommydee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Washington Heights, New York
Posts: 528
Default Re: Native Instruments: Direct Connect versus RTAS??

got an email from cust. service at NI, and you are entirely correct.

the RTAS version of the NI instruments will have full automation, easy this, easy that, (though i'm not sure about the elimination of the IAC bus)...

sounds pretty good... anyone wanna give me a grand, and i'll test 'em out for y'all.

[img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img]

t.d.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-27-2001, 09:11 AM
Park Seward's Avatar
Park Seward Park Seward is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Grants Pass, OR
Posts: 4,284
Default Re: Native Instruments: Direct Connect versus RTAS??

I have the B4 program and it works fine. Great B3 organ sounds.

It is a pain to use the Direct Connect method with OMS. The RTAS way should be excellent.
__________________
Park
The Transfer Lab at Video Park
Analog tape to Pro Tools transfers, 1/4"-2"
http://www.videopark.com
MacPro 6 core 3.33 GHz, OS 10.12.1, 8 GB RAM, PT12.6.1, Focusrite Saffire Pro 40, PreSonus DigiMax, MC Control V3.5, dual displays,
Neumann U-47, Tab V76 mic pre, RCA 44BX and 77DX, MacBook Pro 9,1, 2.3 Mhz, i7, CBS Labs Audimax and Volumax.
Ampex 440B half-track and four-track, 351 tube full-track mono, MM-1100 16-track.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-27-2001, 11:56 AM
Nine Spine Nine Spine is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 468
Default Re: Native Instruments: Direct Connect versus RTAS??

F.Y.I. HTDM stands for HOST-TDM which is a new plugin standard for both platforms. TDM and 001. Learned this at the new seminar. [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
__________________
I.B.S. Studios
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-27-2001, 06:00 PM
bruceup bruceup is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Philly
Posts: 295
Default Re: Native Instruments: Direct Connect versus RTAS??

Park Seward, is the B4 heavy on the cpu usage? I love the way the demo sounds, but don't know how much running B4 will slow my system down.
__________________
a $120k business degree will get you a job on Wall Street - a $120k Berklee degree will get you a job on Beale Street...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No Direct Connect, but RTAS/HTDM only stereo out! form8 Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 2 12-15-2003 06:14 PM
Record Native Instruments w/ Direct Connect and MIDI jeffreyr Digidesign Hardware & Software 0 07-11-2003 02:54 AM
Soft Samplers, Direct Connect vs RTAS tomhartman Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 1 04-28-2003 10:17 PM
Direct Connect from Native Instruments (Finally..) yavuzj 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 37 01-24-2002 11:41 AM
What is Direct Connect from Native? finalcut 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 2 01-23-2002 11:22 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com