|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT Performance
I've been digging around in the MAC forum just to see how MAC PT users are doing with their boxes. I found a posting which coincidently was just revitalised today but dates back to late summer last year.
I can't compare the results posted since the variables of the test are quite different. The MAC test creates 24 tracks with a 4B-EQ then attempts to add effects D-Verbs (usually no more than 6 or 7) and that's it. Interestingly, Eric Day posted a remark in that thread and his test is to load 24 tracks with 5 x 4B-EQ's on each track (120 plugins). Maybe you "real world" guys should give Eric **** too since this is how he tests PT for us. ------------------ --D [This message has been edited by davec (edited April 09, 2001).] |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT Performance
Thanks, Dave. I get plenty of **** already.
Eric Day Digidesign |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT Performance
Always willing to oblidge a fellow developer
------------------ --D |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT Performance
I am using the lightpipe with an alesis AI3 right now. http://alesis.com/products/ai3/ that only gives me 8 inputs. 8 analog + 8 lightpipe + 2 s/pdif = 18. O.K. Is there something you're not telling me? I know I'm cluttering this post but I MUST know how! atsalapizza, Keny
__________________
just to toot my own horn, I am in the process of relocating to Los Angeles and lookign for a job, so if anybody knows someone who can help me get established as an audio engineer and producer, check out my creds at http://www.kenyruyter.com and call me 310-909-9115 myspace page http://www.kenyruyter.com |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT Performance
No, you've got it right. There are only 18 inputs, but you can record 24 tracks... an interesting conundrum.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT Performance
LOL, I wonder if that was simply a physical limitation or a design oversite.
Arguably, the 001 was probably not slated for live 24 track recording (studio or otherwise). Comments Digi? Again, the 24 track test is to push the MOBO+CPU not to determine any weaknesss in PT or to start dissing PT "...because so and so can run more tracks...". The ultimate goal being to determine which MOBO+CPU combo gives the best results under these conditions. ------------------ --D [This message has been edited by davec (edited April 10, 2001).] |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT Performance
Just refreshing the thread.
------------------ --D |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT Performance
Just refreshing the message.
Did anyone notice there are 1000 new user to registered to the DUC now? A whopping 18,000 users now. ------------------ --D |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT Performance
PT 5.1
PII 233 Slot1 ECS P6LX-A (1998 MicroCenter Powerspec 5132) 320M SDRAM Fujitsu 6.4G system Drive Maxtor 30G 7200 RPM Audio Drive Just 4 tracks with the 5 plug-ins (cmp, 4be,slpdl,md,lngdl) |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PT Performance
Just for interests sake:
PT Version : PT 5.1 Tracks : 12 MOBO : ASUS CUSL2-C CPU : Celeron 566/66MHz FSB RAM : 384MB/100 MHz FSB Hard Drive : 1x IBM DESKSTAR 75GXP 45gb ATA100 (using onboard controller) Cheers, Marcus |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Macbook benchmarks/Davec Tests..... | ArtGarceau | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 01-31-2007 08:34 PM |
24/96 davec tests? | Tyler Crawfprd | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 1 | 12-15-2006 02:06 PM |
Davec I,Davec II Tests Both Downloadable Here | davec | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 3 | 11-27-2005 07:45 PM |
hey.... what about the MAC DaveC tests? | JonnyGinese | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 1 | 11-16-2005 01:02 PM |
Results from Davec tests | SEBJOERG | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 10 | 01-29-2002 11:53 AM |