Pro tools Le what's wrong

[angel72]

Hi guys.
I am shocked.
I work with DIGI 002 Pro Tools LE on PC XP about 10 years.
But today i made a test with ver.8.0.3 Pro Tools AVID
I send a signal thru SPDF out and return and record the signal thru SPDF
in,and what?
The siganl that I record on another chanel is the same but not late ,it is hurry with 48 samples.The buffer session is 1024.

I ask my friend with DIGI002 Pro tools LE 8.0.3 the same,the new record hurry also.
I also try with ver.8.0.4,but things are worse.Big HURRY 2444 samples before the original track.
I made that test,because I have TC Reveb 4000 and I send sends from different track to R4000 thru adat (or SPDF)and I record only wet signal from R4000.
And the same ,the record wet signal HURRY UP before the original track.
Any ideas?

[emadsound]

Every thing is wrong with pro tools ver. 8.0.3 beta is better than the final 8.0.4
you can imagine big company do that ??
it crash if Changing sample rat
it destroy the file if you did more than 32 track and you can't open it to reduce he track so you lose your work
the drivers not working with cubase 5 midi in & out
lot of errors if you make simple fade in on any track the oo2 gives error and softwar freez tell you turn off oo2

a

[albee1952]

If you run your reverbs at 100% wet(which I would), then you can just dial in a little extra pre-delay. As for emadsound's comments, there could be dozens of reasons for those problems, from improper system tweaks, incompatible hardware, cracked software(not an accusation, just to point out that it can cause problems).... Personally, I stay in the box and have no major problems with Pro Tools in general, or 8.0.4 on Win7 64 bit, which I am testing now.

[angel72]

Ok.Please guys can samone make the same test to see what'swrong.
Big Thank you

[Keybeeetsss]

Its no reason testing to see whatz wrong; if thatz how its workin then its just that.. the way it works... As Albee said, doing that isn't practical for most so I wouldn't think many would test... the easiest fix is to jus go back to the workin version if the problem is that annoying for lack of a better word... U don't hav to hav the latest update to work in PT as u said, 10 yrs & u were perfectly fine...

[angel72]

OK,today we made the same test with another my friend on Pro Tools 8.0 and 8.0.4.
On ver.8.0 the audio harry with 63 samples.
On ver.8.0.4 the audio harry with 2462 samples.
That is fourth test about the same results.
I will get mad.

[Keybeeetsss]

Originally Posted by angel72

That is fourth test about the same results.
I will get mad.

Well stop testing


I said it earlier its no need for u to do it & to jus go back to 8 if it worked great for 10yrs instead of testing & gettin



ooopsss, I left 1 out

[angel72]

I think that is not just my problem.
The problem is for all Pro Tools LE users.
I will made the test with 7.4ver.
How can you use any hardware compressor Eq,or what ever?

[pcmusicpro]

Originally Posted by angel72

I think that is not just my problem.
The problem is for all Pro Tools LE users.
I will made the test with 7.4ver.
How can you use any hardware compressor Eq,or what ever?

I support you, you are right. But the trend here is don´t complain, don´t do extrange tests no one is interested in. Take it or leave it. Don´t ask for a fix, you wont get it because it´s always your system that is wrong. Don´t annoy people with feature requests, it is like criticize someone´s religion, just have faith and patience, and maybe, some day Avid (God) will bless you.

I still use v 7.4, that´s the best they could achieve.

Ed.

[angel72]

I understand your sense of humour,but that Big company with big respect.
By the way ,you can test your 7.4 and you will maybe surprise.