|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#121
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why PT10 is not 64 bit... let's get this over with ;)
Quote:
|
#122
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why PT10 is not 64 bit... let's get this over with ;)
I am facing the same issue here .. :) No need to post anything ... Pro Tools affinity with a MAC beats all the PCs around ... I am selling my PC which I spent over 3500$ (SSDs, RAM, Caviar Blacks, etc ...) for almost $2000 in order to buy a Mac Pro and solve my problem ... :) Cheers
|
#123
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why PT10 is not 64 bit... let's get this over with ;)
Quote:
|
#124
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why PT10 is not 64 bit... let's get this over with ;)
True Emcha ... with the only difference that windows 7 is nothing compared to Lion ! :)
|
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why PT10 is not 64 bit... let's get this over with ;)
Quote:
But let's not start that war, lol.
__________________
D a n t h e I n c r e d i b l e S o u n d M a n "Svetlana" v1 - 4.2GHz i7, 16GB RAM, OSX 10.7.4 Liquid Saffire 56 - PT10.2 - BFD2, VCC, Duende Native, Play 3.0 _C U R R E N T-D V E R B-S C O R E:515 |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why PT10 is not 64 bit... let's get this over with ;)
This is more along the lines of PT10 vs. The Rest of the World.
I'm going to ask a quick question. How many of you EVER, IN YOUR WHOLE CAREER, go any higher than 15 VI or 70 Audio (even if you included subs and masters) in a single session? I've used Sonar (6-x1) and even then I had to get extremely bored and start subgrouping by EQ frequency just to hit 100 audio tracks. This was WITH a full vocal compliment including overdubs. If you know what you are doing TRACK COUNT IS MOOT. Next question. Have you EVER ran into a musical turd so bad that you had to clog your session with plugins? I have, AND I did an A/B between Reaper/Sonar/PT 9 and PT10 (this morning) 53 Audio Tracks 14 Sub Groups 1 Master Fader 3 Virtual Instruments (Peavey Revalver, Steven Slate Drums, Toontrack Superior Drummer) The initial session was done in PT9 and mimicked EXACTLY in the other DAWs. THERE WAS NO SIDECHAINING SO THAT IS MOOT. Other than the VIs ONLY plugins from WAVES were used to ensure that "proprietary" plugins could not be blamed. The numbers below represent how many plugins remained just for playback to occur at a "glitchy" state. The same plugins were disabled each test. Sonar - 98 plugins (once again ALL Plugins were the same from session to session.) Reaper - 107 plugins PT 9 - ALL 134 plugins CPU 86% PT 10 - ALL 134 plugins CPU 74% I expect to be burned at the stake for this post, but lets be honest here, I started life hating everything Digi/Avid stood for and now that I actually use the products I kick myself for not making the switch. It is the industry standard for a reason. Why do you think Dunlop has a stranglehold on Picks or Zildjan and Sabian have a stranglehold on Cymbals? They are good at what they do and they do it right. YES the logic may seem confusing at first, but in the end the product is normally pretty darned good.
__________________
Wizarding Status REVOKED until I clean out my link box. |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why PT10 is not 64 bit... let's get this over with ;)
AND just so you know
Tracking Computer: DAW: ProTools 10 CD Burning: Sony CD Architect 5 OS: Windows 7 64bit Home Premium Mobo: Asus M3A78 CPU: AMD Phenom II x4 940 3GHz RAM: 4GB Kingston DDR2 1333 Graphics: Saphire ATI Radeon 4870 HD 1GB Storage: 1 TB 7200RPM Seagate HD Mixing Computer: DAW: ProTools 10 CD Burning: Sony CD Architect 5 OS: Windows 7 64bit Home Premium Mobo: Asus M4A87TD CPU: AMD Phenom II x6 T1100 3.3GHz RAM: 8GB G-Skill DDR3 1333 Graphics: Saphire ATI Radeon 4870 HD 1GB Storage: 1.64 TB 7200RPM Seagate HD There you go. The tests were done on the mixing computer
__________________
Wizarding Status REVOKED until I clean out my link box. |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why PT10 is not 64 bit... let's get this over with ;)
Quote:
Quote:
|
#129
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why PT10 is not 64 bit... let's get this over with ;)
Finally good news!
But now I have a problem... I'm ready to jump on the new system and I love what it will bring. BUT. I am just finishing a really LONG cd recording and mixing that involve many collaboration and many recalls (one of the strenghts of ITB). If I upgrade to the new HDX cards I will loose many important plugins that only are available in TDM and with that my recalls will be useless since I will not get back that sounds until the AAX version of the plugins will be available (and is not really clear when or IF that will be). That a major problem for me at the moment and that alone might stop me to upgrade, not counting the cost that will be needed to do a crossgrade of all my plugins (a minor issue but still a lot of money to take into account). At the moment I don't see a lot of enthusiasm from plugin developers... In fact some of them don't even think of following AVID in that step. So my first step will be to listen to the new system and than maybe choose to just go to PT10HD (until all my plugins will be AAX ready) or see if I can close all my projects before the switching and forget about recalling them in the future. Not an easy situation for me to decide. Any suggestion?
__________________
Max Carola Recording Engineer - Mixer - Producer - Composer www.maxcarola.com Pro Tools Ultimate 2023.6.0 - Monterey MacBook M1Pro 10-16GB Dangerous Music Summing - Focusrite Dante Rednet2 - Amek/Neve, Focusrite, TC Electronics, Mytek DA, Apogee ADDA |
#130
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why PT10 is not 64 bit... let's get this over with ;)
Max,
Is there something you can't do with your current set-up that you could do with PTHD10? If not... If you have to/need to/must upgrade, IMHO just go to PTHD10 and continue to use your current plug-ins. When AAX is all sorted and you've made beaucoup d'argent from your current project, then update. But have a back-up plan just in case. Maybe keep the TDM system you have and set-up a new HDX system. Cheers,
__________________
Take your projects to the next level with a non-union national read at reasonable rates Demos: brucehayward dot com SonoBus Source-Connect: brucehayward Options for Remote Direction |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Session share issue, PT10 Mac to PT10 express PC | Big Mother | macOS | 0 | 04-16-2013 07:03 AM |
PT10 HD system can't cope with session created in PT10 (LE) | LizS | Pro Tools 10 | 19 | 07-27-2012 03:46 PM |
Bought PT10, do I remove the PT10 demo? | esperanto | macOS | 2 | 04-18-2012 12:01 PM |
PT10 help please , does PT10 really work on win 7 (digi support please) | digi003 | Windows | 6 | 02-01-2012 06:36 PM |
PT10 interop with PT9/8/7 -- Can PT10 force .ptf compatible audio? | jeremiahmoore | Post - Surround - Video | 8 | 10-25-2011 08:55 PM |