|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
I spoke to several reps about this during namm in January. One of the only reasons I kept up with pla was for the voice count promise. It's not going to happen and it has been abandoned. Sad to say.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
They are working on something other than a simple voice count increase. I can't say what and nobody knows when, but it sounded very promising to me. Hang in there.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
HDX users are their cash cow. HDX is a Naked King and you have to pay extra to dress it.
- Additional voices - you have to pay again. - Extra 4/5/6 HDX cards need to be paid again. - Connect ancient tape recorders - you have to pay again. - You have to pay to connect your own interfaces. - Connect someone else's AVB interfaces - you have to pay again. - Are you in intensive care and have no time for Pro Tools? It doesn't matter, you still have to pay. In Russia, they like to fine and tax motorists. These are those who can be milked forever. HDX users are also motorists, they can be milked forever. )) In version 2020.9 there is already AVB technology, but Avid has not mentioned it anywhere in the documents, apparently they are testing and the announcement will be in the next releases. Well, of course everything will be for an additional fee )) Last edited by BernVi; 09-22-2020 at 11:07 PM. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
Who would believe this anymore.
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
I'm not in a hurry for more voices rather need stability. Hdx3 in my system.
Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
unlike the Burn above a smart firmware for current and aggressive-priced for older non-upgrade capable cards.
__________________
(Help us Help You)<<<click here Profile-System Tracks: https://www.n1m.com/datatunesdetroit Apple Music https://music.apple.com/us/search?term=DatatunesDetroit |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
As a HDX user I'd like to see two different playback engine modes.
1. "Tracking Mode" this is the current HDX engine we are using. The "mixer" is hosted on the HDX DSP for low latency throughput monitoring. A huge benefit for tracking bands or recording ADR. 2. Plug-in DSP only mode, aka "mix mode". This would use the HDX DSP to host plug-ins only, and use the native mix engine underneath. This would allow for the increased native voices/voice packs. Basically allow the HDX DSP to stop hosting the mixer/routing, and let it act like an UAD plug-in host..
__________________
"Any experiment of interest in life will be carried out at your own expense." |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
Still no news on this one?
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
Total silence... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
http://www.ricardomosca.com Hackintosh, 3,7 GHz 10-Core Intel i9, 64 GB 3200 MHz DDR4, OSX Catalina 10.15.7, PT HDX 2023.9.0, SSL 4040G+, tons of outboard Mac Book M1 Pro, 16GB RAM, OSX 23.6, PT Studio 2023.9.0 |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FEATURE REQUEST: Give HDX *at least* the same voice count as a non-HDX interface
They don't even have tech support anymore you expect programmers to do this? At this point I am treating my protools rig like a tape machine. I don't expect it to change at all and getting on with my work.
Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PT 10 HD3 TDM voice count? | wtfil | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 5 | 08-18-2014 08:52 AM |
HD7 voice count | Raoul23 | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Win) | 7 | 11-13-2011 01:08 AM |
Advantage of More DSP's for Same Voice Count? | SuperReverb | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 3 | 02-01-2009 05:56 AM |
PT HD voice count | garnoil | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 10 | 11-05-2008 07:47 PM |
Voice count for PT NT|24 Mix | Euphony Sound | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Win) | 1 | 04-21-1999 10:26 AM |