|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#301
|
|||
|
|||
Re: In Response to Pro Tools HD 10 Feedback
Wow. Didn't realize the purchase happened that long ago. Thx for the non-flamed correction.
|
#302
|
|||
|
|||
Re: In Response to Pro Tools HD 10 Feedback
Quote:
Besides being greedy and smug to their customers, they are probably also a horrible company to work for, with no job security and no opportunities for growth. Once you're done with your project, you're done getting paid.
__________________
- Mac Pro 2.66 Quad 8GB RAM, PT 9.0.6 (OS X 10.6.7) |
#303
|
|||
|
|||
Re: In Response to Pro Tools HD 10 Feedback
Quote:
__________________
https://lukehoward.com/ |
#304
|
|||
|
|||
Re: In Response to Pro Tools HD 10 Feedback
also as a thought, let us compare the the increase in power of the apple computers we use everyday from the time that the accel cards first arrived to present day. I would say that the current mac pros are much more then 5 TIMES MORE powerful then the G4s that we used at the arrival of the accel cards. Yet the prices have stayed fairly consistent. So why should we be so excited the new HDX cards are only 5x more powerful then their predecessors.
__________________
OSX 10.6.8 |
#305
|
|||
|
|||
Re: In Response to Pro Tools HD 10 Feedback
Quote:
Thats three I can think that of stand out. Now what will be interesting to see is what will the HDX cards offer over HD native when PT11 drops. We wont really know until we see how AAX works natively verses the HDX card. The majority of users may not even need DSP cards at that point.
__________________
Scott Formerly Hobo Wan Kenobi Core 2 Specs Page ASUS P6T6 Revolution | i7 930 | 12GB OCZ DDR3 1600 7-7-7-20 | PTLE 10 | CPTK | 003 | Presonus D8 | 11Rack | Alesis AI3 | Presonus HP60 | Mercury + Studio Classics | Sound Toys | MasseyPack | Axiom61 | MAudio Keystation Pro 88 |
#306
|
|||
|
|||
Re: In Response to Pro Tools HD 10 Feedback
During the past 10 years I've had to upgrade 3 different TDM rigs and 2 LE systems. From a TDM Mix Plus to a HD2 PCIe. Bloody hell! I have been loyal and I've deposited quite a few of my hard-earned cash to Avid (via Digidesign). Currently running Pro Tools 8 HD, and I have three systems in my studio, it's time I call it quits! (Unless something radical to the pricing strategy takes place).
I already purchased Samplitude X and I am willing to give it a try through Bootcamp. If I like it, I am willing to spend a bit more for Sequoia. But no, I am not spending more for AAX and HDx! No more $$$ for a company treating its loyal customers like that. I do appreciate that technology advances but I don't appreciate taking any corporation taking advantage of this loyalty. If everyone threatens not to buy, what would Avid really do? |
#307
|
|||
|
|||
Re: In Response to Pro Tools HD 10 Feedback
I didn't upgrade from HD8 to HD9 because the HD9 version gave us nothing new. The benefits were targeted at non HD. So, now I have to eat 1500 to make it to HD10? Which doesn't even benefit us as much as the native? Again, the HD guys are getting the raw end of the deal.
Wow, wow, wow. Good luck with that. I think you need to reconsider some kind of better upgrade path for all HD users, those from 8 and 9. |
#308
|
|||
|
|||
Re: In Response to Pro Tools HD 10 Feedback
Quote:
__________________
iMac i5 2.8GHz, Macbook Pro 2.4GHz, Pro Tools 10/11, MOTU 828mk2, Presonus Digimax FS, Presonus Firestudio Project, TC Konnekt 24D --- iCON Photography |
#309
|
|||
|
|||
Re: In Response to Pro Tools HD 10 Feedback
Max,
Thanks for responding on-point to so many of the questions. As a software release, I think Pro Tools 10 is *outstanding*. It’s obvious a lot of hard work, planning, and listening to customers needs has produced the best Pro Tools yet. I do, though, want to address the software license aspect of the HD product line that seems like it’s falling between the cracks, both in terms of official policy, as well as pragmatic upgrade concerns. The problem is this: There are owners of PT9 HD licenses that no longer have their HD hardware... they have sold the physical gear, but retained the license. Or, there are others considering selling their aging TDM hardware but keeping the HD license to retain host-based PT+CPTK capability. For example, many of us work at facilities which may be upgrading to HDX, but for our home/personal systems we cannot justify (and cannot afford) new hardware-based DSP. Until fairly recently many of us HAD to have our own HD systems to remain session and feature compatible with facility systems. But then with PT9 we had a host-based feature-rich version, and we’re grateful for that. PT9 with CPTK (and sometimes not with CPTK) allows us to work anywhere. But with the new software upgrade policies, what is the owner of an HD license (with no hardware) to do? For example, my business partner and I currently own four HD TDM systems and want to sell our hardware. There is a market for this. We want to retain our HD licenses, use the software, and be able to pay a reasonable price to upgrade it. And our old hardware just won’t keep going, which is why we want to sell it. In fact, you mentioned (in a response to crashboombam): "... While Pro Tools HD software sells with our hardware, those that already have a Pro Tools HD license can choose never to update the hardware again or use 3rd party hardware. Yet, we still have to do the software development to support HD hardware, whether you use it or not." Note your answer to danader11’s question: "With this support plan option, is it true that you also need a qualifying system, not just a HD9 asset on your iLok, to qualify?" Your answer was: "That is correct." So you have denied us the opportunity to purchase the $599 support contract? We only want to work natively, but now we have been forced to sign up to support HD hardware development by paying 3x the software upgrade price of CPTK owners? I need to pay 3x the upgrade cost for the same feature set? I’ll never be able to get on your subscription-model of upgrades? With the release of Pro Tools 9, you allowed Pro Tools 9HD license owners to be able to work natively. Sticking us with this $1K upgrade feels like you’re trying to close the barn door after you let the horse out. So - couldn’t Avid offer a PTHD to PT/CPTK license crossgrade program for the customers who in this economy cannot afford to purchase expensive new Avid hardware? |
#310
|
|||
|
|||
Re: In Response to Pro Tools HD 10 Feedback
An excellent point if I may say so. I'm very interested in a reply from Max, not just for your sake or my own.
__________________
"My ego comes pre-shrunk" - Randy Thom |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intermittent Response from Pro Tools 11 | 303Dan | Pro Tools 11 | 13 | 02-07-2016 10:08 AM |
Does Pro Tools have a frequency response? | barismanco123 | General Discussion | 21 | 09-22-2014 01:06 PM |
no sound / response from PCR-300 and Pro Tools 8 | lostlantern | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 5 | 02-12-2012 05:35 PM |
no sound / response from PCR-300 and Pro Tools 8 | lostlantern | MIDI | 1 | 02-11-2012 08:05 PM |
In Response to the Response to Pro Tools HD 10 Feedback... | Dism | Pro Tools 10 | 31 | 10-29-2011 06:11 AM |