View Single Post
  #9  
Old 01-30-2009, 03:38 PM
DrFord's Avatar
DrFord DrFord is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 873
Default Re: 96K vs. 48K vs. 44.1K

OG made a poignant statement when he talked about a good converter. When I got my apogees it changed my sonic world. The difference between 44.1k and 96k on my apogee is not audible to my ears, On my 002 the difference between 96k and 44.1 was night a day. But the difference between 96k on my 002 and 44.1k on my Apogee incredible. It doesn't even come close. Just pulling up old mixes and re-bouncing them made them 10x better.

Funny part is that 192k doesn't really even get used. I don't know many who do use it, unless they have all the right plug-ins that will work with it, or unless they are recording at a million dollar studio with a full complement of outboard gear, and happen to have a spare terabite hard drive to record to.
__________________
DRFord
Homepage | Facebook | YouTube
Mac OSX 10.12.6 | Mac Pro 5,1 | 12core 3.46ghz
Avid HD Native PCIe Core | Pro Tools HD 2018.1
Reply With Quote