View Single Post
  #2  
Old 06-19-2019, 02:48 PM
reichman's Avatar
reichman reichman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 2,411
Default Re: C|24 vs D-Command w/ fader expansion pack

No contest. Advanced automation on the D-Command is much easier to get to. If Preview and Capture are part of your workflow, it's a little fiddly to get to those functions on the C|24. Also, I don't think C|24 has VCA spill. D-Command is an overall better surface. Compact, very professional, dedicated spill zones and EQ and Dyn knobs. C|24 is too big.

But before you buy anything, check out S3/Dock. Yes, it's only 16 channels, but I think it's a better design overall. I'm really happy with mine and wouldn't trade it for a 24-fader D-Command.
__________________
Nathaniel Reichman
Producer/Re-recording Mixer - New York
Nathaniel Reichman | IMDB | LinkedIn
Reply With Quote