Quote:
No pop phychology going on. Just observations. You, Peter, wrote more, described things in depth, and managed to give numerical ratings that varied according to the way you viewed the work. Whether I agree with your reviews and view (which mostly I do) I respect that you did the work and broke them down into their constituent parts. Cheers to you.
Roy, on the other hand, wrote about two sentences in each case, and seemed in many cases to simply choose a number for the arrangement and type it in 12 times repetitively for everything being reviewed. For this I can't applaud, even though again I agree with many, if not most, of his comments on the individual songs.
|
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Ya gotta marvel at people who did not participate in any capacity, then pop into this contest thread and start criticizing the volunteers who actually did the work.
Hopefully, nobody in the group who put time and effort into this event gives a flying wazoo about these issues - Pete and Roy have different styles (which is a good thing) and they both did their jobs. So kudos to them and let's get the focus back to where it belongs...the music.
I'm listening to the tracks now, and I'm having a blast. They really are all great. I'll be back with some comments later.