Re: Video Format: Encoded Size vs. Display Size?
Quote:
Originally Posted by reichman
I have a video from a client:
DNxHD
bit rate 100 Mbit/s
interlaced
encoded size 1440 x 1080
display size 1920 x 1080
It doesn't perform well. A little choppy, AVE reads 160% CPU usage. Converted the video with Media Encoder to one of my DNx presets to this:
DNxHD
bit rate 147 Mbit/s
progressive
encoded size 1920 x 1080
display size 1920 x 1080
And now AVE is using 80% CPU. I've run into this "encoded size" issue before. What's happening? Or is it the interlacing that's causing the AVE problem?
|
Sound like you are transcoding to an extreme DNxHD bitrate. Try DNxHD36. (1920x1080 @ 36Mbit/s) very light CPU usage and looks just fine for sound work.
Unless you are projecting super-big 36 is plenty for sound work.
__________________
PTHDn 2024.3 (OSX13.6.5), 8x8x8, MacPro 14,8, AJA LHi, SYNC HD, all genlocked via AJA GEN10, 64GB RAM, Xilica Neutrino, Meyersound Acheron
|