Thread: Sends on faders
View Single Post
  #8  
Old 01-03-2014, 06:26 AM
nigelpry's Avatar
nigelpry nigelpry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Home
Posts: 2,166
Default Re: Sends on faders

I can see some value in a flip fader option in PT software itself, it could be better in some cases than having to open up lots of individual long send faders that we can do already.

The main limitation is that you would have to be rigorous (aren't we all?) in dedicating a specific send slot on all channels to send to the same bus. I've seen many sessions where sends to a specific bus are spread across various send slots.

It could be very confusing if you used a flip fader option in the software and what you got on the long faders were actually sends to a variety of different busses. There would have to be an update of the track output selector to show the fader is a send, and to show which bus it is being sent to.

In fact, you could quickly end up with utter chaos if you didn't keep an keen eye on exactly what send routing each longer fader was actually currently controlling.
__________________
Mac Pro 2009 with 2010 firmware, 12-Core 3.46ghz, 64gb RAM & working Thunderbolt, OS 10.14.6 and Windows 10
iMac 2012 27", 3.4ghz i7, 32gb RAM OS 10.14.6
Digi 003 Console for control surface only, Focusrite OctopreLE and MOTU Traveler for extra analog-ADAT conversion, UAD Apollo Quad Silver with Thunderbolt card, Apollo x4 and pci-e Octo, Adam A77X monitors.
Pro Tools 2022.4, Media Composer 8.9, Sibelius 8.7, Cubase Pro 11, Wavelab Pro 11, Logic Pro X 10.5.1, Mainstage 3.
Various apps, soft synths, FX plugins.
Plenty of hardware synths, rack gear, microphones etc.
And then there's the studio ;-)
Reply With Quote