View Single Post
  #4  
Old 09-18-2017, 12:51 AM
TNM TNM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,570
Default Re: So, latency on HD Native vs HDX?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFreak View Post
No.
how is this possible.. I have heard that 32 tracks at the lowest buffer in HDN provides incredible computer strain, let alone the 64 it allows!

It's latency is only acceptable at 64 samples at 96K or 32 samples at 44k (barely)..if one wants to use native FX..

i'd need to permanently stream 64 outboard channels into it.. i'd use it like a live analog mixer.. I just can't imagine the imac handling that...

Does anyone know of any videos showing real world cpu usage of HDN when using the lowest buffer?
__________________
- Apple Mac Studio M2 Ultra/64gb/UA Apollo x 3+Adat x 3/UAD Satellite x 3/OS 14.41/PT 2024.3/Nuendo 13/LogicX
Reply With Quote