Re: Protools needs an open beta
Good ol Jfreak being Jfreak. Btw, asking you to clarify what you mean isn’t “putting words in your mouth”. Also, Avid’s archaic development methods are not “common sense” by any stretch of the imagination. I’d argue that having an open beta for paying customers should be common sense since they’re obviously having trouble squashing some of the old bugs and they’re very weak when it comes to adding innovative new features despite us essentially crowdfunding them by paying in advance for updates.
If Avid’s developers are curmudgeons like Jfreak, then it’s safe to say they’re probably incapable of extending themselves beyond their current bubble. This has become painfully evident in recent years. And quite frankly, Avid could improve PR substantially by 86’ing the condescending mods on this board. They only serve to perpetuate the garbage attitude that Avid consistently shown towards paying customers which isn’t helpful when you’re struggling with glitchy software.
|