Re: 44.1 kHz vs. 48 kHz - why not use the higher?
Quote:
Originally Posted by necjamc
I swear I can hear a difference in signal quality at 96K. But that could definitely
be my imagination knowing that it's a higher (better) sample rate.
|
There was a thread here on the DUC that talked about an experiment where two buttons were labeled "44.1" and "96". Subjects listened to the sounds by pressing the appropriate buttons and reporting their opinions. They all said the "96" button sounded better than the "44.1" button.
Except the buttons were reversed. The 96 was really the 44.1.
__________________
Park
The Transfer Lab at Video Park
Analog tape to Pro Tools transfers, 1/4"-2"
http://www.videopark.com
MacPro 6 core 3.33 GHz, OS 10.12.1, 8 GB RAM, PT12.6.1, Focusrite Saffire Pro 40, PreSonus DigiMax, MC Control V3.5, dual displays,
Neumann U-47, Tab V76 mic pre, RCA 44BX and 77DX, MacBook Pro 9,1, 2.3 Mhz, i7, CBS Labs Audimax and Volumax.
Ampex 440B half-track and four-track, 351 tube full-track mono, MM-1100 16-track.
|