View Single Post
  #3  
Old 11-23-2011, 11:23 PM
chrisdee's Avatar
chrisdee chrisdee is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 3,166
Default Re: omni/native latency vs mbox pro latency

Thanks nst7.

I just found the following about direct monitoring in the omni manual on page 34.
http://akmedia.digidesign.com/suppor...825.pdf#page38

Quote:
The Mixer page of the Hardware Setup dialog lets you configure HD OMNI to mix the signals coming from HD OMNI physical inputs to the current active Monitor paths (direct monitor- ing). This way you monitor any incoming signal whether or not it is routed through the
Pro Tools mixer.
Does this mean I can mute the recorded channel in pt but still hear the vocalist with zero latency through the omni mixer through the headphones out ?

In this case it will be like my mbox pro and just what im looking for. Timing while recording wont be an issue.
In this case I could actually set and forget the buffersize in pt to 512 or 1024 because ill be using direct monitoring while tracking instead?
__________________
Christian D Hagen | I7 Builds | PT/OS Compability Chart
Reply With Quote