Re: 44.1 kHz vs. 48 kHz - why not use the higher?
Quote:
Originally Posted by daeron80
I imagine that an 11 kHz tone drawn with 8 words per cycle is going to be more accurately represented than one drawn with 4 words per cycle. That sort of thing, intuitively, seems like it should result in a smoother sounding reverb. No?
|
No. The reconstruction filter will recreate the same output as long as the sound is less than half Nyquist. The sound will be the same. A higher sampling rate, by itself, will have no effect.
__________________
Park
The Transfer Lab at Video Park
Analog tape to Pro Tools transfers, 1/4"-2"
http://www.videopark.com
MacPro 6 core 3.33 GHz, OS 10.12.1, 8 GB RAM, PT12.6.1, Focusrite Saffire Pro 40, PreSonus DigiMax, MC Control V3.5, dual displays,
Neumann U-47, Tab V76 mic pre, RCA 44BX and 77DX, MacBook Pro 9,1, 2.3 Mhz, i7, CBS Labs Audimax and Volumax.
Ampex 440B half-track and four-track, 351 tube full-track mono, MM-1100 16-track.
|