Re: To HEAT or not to HEAT?
Quote:
I mean the competitors are soo much cheaper so Avid will most likely keep it HD only. Our Waves NLS license is for sale if anyone want it. $50 plus $25 transfer fee from iLok. |
Re: To HEAT or not to HEAT?
Quote:
|
Re: To HEAT or not to HEAT?
I second TrackerLe on Crane Song Phoenix 2. I use it on literally every track.
|
Re: To HEAT or not to HEAT?
Quote:
Seems Dave Hill has been busy... :cool: (and I need to find a way to explain to my wife why spending more money on music gear is a good thing) |
Re: To HEAT or not to HEAT?
Quote:
|
Re: To HEAT or not to HEAT?
HEAT already works on native so next logical step would be allowing it on non-HD (once their marketing dept wants the extra cash)
|
Re: To HEAT or not to HEAT?
Quote:
... when people say it works on PT Native we whouldn’t confuse that with Non HD versions as in ”Native” systems as you will always need a PTHD version with or without Avid hardware thanks to the fact they uncoupled HEAT from the need for Avid Hardware when HD12 came out I believe. |
Re: To HEAT or not to HEAT?
true.
so.. currently working on native but requiring HD license. therefore it is only marketing dept decision not allowing HEAT on "vanilla" or first |
Re: To HEAT or not to HEAT?
Today I got a 30 days Trial/Demo of Pro Tools Ultimate and HEAT :-)
So far HEAT makes every audio track sound really good :cool: Still it is such a bummer that I don't really need all the features of Ultimate :confused: |
Re: To HEAT or not to HEAT?
Hmm. It makes everything louder. Try doing an A-B test, level-matched. (You may have to print a mix in order to do this.)
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:15 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com