Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Back in April 2012 here, Slate announced AAX-DSP support. We're all aware of the delays from Slate Digital (I'm quite anxious for their release), however with the apparent approaching onslaught of Slate Digital plugs about to be released in AAX format - do we have any ideas if these new versions will also include AAX-DSP? One of the strong influencers for my purchase of HDX was Slate's statement above.
Steven? Any comments? |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
As far as I have understood them (Slatedigital) there will be AAX Native for now and haven't heard anything regarding AAX-DSP unfortunately. however I have only talked to one guy there who help us out immensly with an issue with SSD4 Platinum and he did a super job taking over our computer from the US. I asked him a few other things afterwards and DSP versions were on of them :o Hopefully I am wrong and Slate will come out with AAX-DSP and we will all have a ball :p Best Regards Christopher |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
While I have every reason to have reservations, Steven did say we would get DSP versions. I sure hope we do, as that's when this company will come to life for me.
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
I'm in the same boat with you. I'm hoping to get Slate AAX DSP ASAP!
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Last time I asked Slate that question I got a different answer. It was "we'll see after getting native out"
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
I wonder if we'll see a Q1 roll out of the remaining must have AAX plugins in Native and then see a end of Q2 - Q3 AAX DSP roll out as paid feature upgrades.
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Just want to get AAX-native of FG-X and VTM as in yesterday :D :D :D
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Unfortunately they're still not ready with AAX native, so I think there are two possibilities here. One, they are so occupied with this recoding process that AAX DSP is not on their radar yet, or they are very cleverly planning the recode process, so AAX DSP is not far away from the Native release.
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Yep,
Steven said they were doing it, hope they dont change their minds. That would be very disappointing. |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
LOL... don't hold your breath!
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Hahah - Soon
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
My understanding is that AAX-DSP code also will run native so if they are recoding everything from scratch, it probably is going to be DSP, assuming that's possible for a given plug.
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
I'm hoping that I'm reading in between the lines correctly when I read of delays associated with recoding the plugs to 1)run in a new common framework 2) be more resource efficient. I'm hoping those two efforts are designed to spread out their offerings across both AAX-Native and AAX-DSP. I can't imagine why they'd be last to the AAX table unless they had a "surprise" for us up their sleeve. In my opinion, adding AAX-DSP to their offerings would really propel them solidly into position as "THE PRO OFFERING" on the Pro Tools platform.
That hoped for - I would love to get updated from Steven/Fabrice on their current musings on AAX-DSP. |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Via Facebook Feb 6th:
Slate Digital LLC: The new VCC 2 is gonna be killer guys! We're working on it. New features, new FREE console, FREE update! Thanks for your patience, it'll be worth it! Is the current VBC DSP? I thought that was their "flagship" new framework plugin - that would tell you something, yes? |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
Nice I didn't know - I don't think I've liked them on FB - I appreciate the info |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
Again - I'm reading smoke signals, and that smoke might be hallucinatory inducing. I have absolutely no Slate knowledge nor contact with Slate or Slate Digital. Steven/Fabrice - what is the AAX-DSP thinking almost 2 years since commitment? |
Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
For my part I think they *really* need to do their homework on the optimization front.
They skiped that part last time around. What is the real value of a plug-in that is truely best-of-class audio-wise if I end up not using it because of its too high demands on my cpu. Other shops can make their stuff run much more efficiently on the same cpus... |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
The trick is achieving BOTH great sound and efficiency. This is not trivial at all.
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Agreed. But it's part of the game...
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
I understand the CPU resource issues brought up, but personally I'd rather have a set of complex plugs that sound amazing regardless of the CPU hit. Frankly - the reason I want to see Slate AAX-DSP is to address that very issue and have the option to offload the processor hit onto a HDX Card.
Not only do I want my VCC back, I want my VCC, VTM, VBC, FG-X on AAX-DSP. |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
DSP DSP DSP!!! I'm in the Olympic spirit :)
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Any update on these? Steven?
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
As SPA's unofficial PR spokesman, I say he is busy doing a video shoot. Sorry guys |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
He been saying he is doing AAX DSP since October 2012 - It's April 2014 - that says something right there.
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
If I remember correctly, the demo did have an AAX version? Anyway, hopefully he will come through |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
He's not coding by himself. AAX64 is not yet even a year-old format so naturally every company out there tries to release AAX64-native first and then go figure what needs to be done to get the DSP version out.
Except Sonnox. They were one of the first to release AAX-native and AAX-DSP simultaneously. Everything they have and can be fitted into DSP have already been around for some time and in my book that makes them look better company than before. (I didn't like their decision to have plugin transfers pre-approved by them, but at least it makes their iLok licenses safer than many others...) If you have a one-man company, or have otherwise limited resources, it's not so easy. Give it time, they'll come. Even a company called Lexicon that is backed by Harman (huge company) has had trouble releasing their stuff. Only PCM are released as Alpha (or what I would call public beta) and they surely should have the time and money to have it done already. I like fresh new starts and this is one of them. Let's just sit tight and wait. This is a major transition and we don't want plugin companies to simply port things over but take their time and code the plugs more efficiently, do we? |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
all in all - his plugs do sound remarkably good!
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
|
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
And AFAIK the story goes so that AAX-DSP is very much less limited compared to TDM so anyone who has algorithm working as TDM should be able to convert that algorithm working as AAX-DSP, should they want to. |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
There may be more reasons (they are not at issue in my mind), but the core of the complaint is:
All of this leads to Slate's credibility beginning to crumble in my opinion. I'm disappointed and frustrated with his business ... um ... methods? Again - If I didn't love his plugs - I wouldn't complain. Steven - take it as a backhanded compliment of your shipping and working plugs (not of your PR nor scheduling nor resource management ability). |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
All plugin vendors started over less than a year ago. Avid changed the AAX spec from PT10 to PT11 so I myself don't give a damn how long it takes to release quality stuff, as long as the release is top notch.
Another feeling regarding companies such as TC Electonic and Waves who won't be porting their old TDM stuff over to AAX-DSP... |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
FWIW there is nothing stopping people from audiosuiting them in PT 10 and then moving to 11. Obviously he got in over his head in technology and he freely admits it.
That said all plug-ins are still the bargain of the century. |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Moving of from Slate FGX which will never be AAX DSP from the looks of things Slate has been promising for years now - Duy Dream Dynamics is freaking awesome and AAX 64 DSP!
It crushes FGX |
Re: Slate Digital AAX-DSP?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:21 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com