Vacuum patch gets shorter decay time at 96kHz session than 192kHz session
I just made a Vacuum patch yesterday and noticed something strange happening with the decay going from 192kHz to 96kHz.
The decay time in the patch I made is considerably shorter for a 96kHz session compared to a 192kHz session. I will post the name of the factory patch I tweaked with it's settings when I get home after work. Hopefully this can be replicated by others. |
Re: Vacuum patch gets shorter decay time at 96kHz session than 192kHz session
Here are that the patches I have problems with.
Try opening in both a 192k session and then in a 96k session. http://dillner.net/vacuum/ |
Re: Vacuum patch gets shorter decay time at 96kHz session than 192kHz session
Anyone had the chance to try this ?
|
Re: Vacuum patch gets shorter decay time at 96kHz session than 192kHz session
Quote:
|
Re: Vacuum patch gets shorter decay time at 96kHz session than 192kHz session
Quote:
|
Re: Vacuum patch gets shorter decay time at 96kHz session than 192kHz session
Quote:
|
Re: Vacuum patch gets shorter decay time at 96kHz session than 192kHz session
Quote:
|
Re: Vacuum patch gets shorter decay time at 96kHz session than 192kHz session
Give it a shot anyway Stig as it might have gone under the radar. ;)
|
Re: Vacuum patch gets shorter decay time at 96kHz session than 192kHz session
Quote:
|
Re: Vacuum patch gets shorter decay time at 96kHz session than 192kHz session
Can't test this for you. I forgot that the enclosure connector (AES/EBU) on my interface only support up to 96 kHz, and it's a major hassle for me to get behind the racks to re-wire the I/O's.
Sorry. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:39 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com