Apollo 16 and HD Native
 

I think I found my solution. Ill get the Apollo 16 and pay the HD upgrade 599 :(. Abandon all Avid Hardware and still get all the benefits of HD.

After researching the Pros and Cons of a HDX and 8x8x8 upgrade from my TDM and 192. I think this is the best way to go. Also HD Native has more benefits than going HDX.

I am shocked that people invested in a limited DSP card.

It is funny I would think that they would offer people who bought there hardware a break on the PT11 upgrade

Re: Apollo 16 and HD Native
 

I tried the Apollo running Native (I have an HD2 TDM), I could not use it. All I got was buffers errors. I was using PT 10 may be PT11 is better?

Re: Apollo 16 and HD Native
 

I use. Apollo Quad with a i7 quad core MPB, and it's rock solid I use PT10HD,I use the thunderbolt option, had a HD3 accell system and this is way better, go with the Apollo, you'll never regret it

Re: Apollo 16 and HD Native
 

when you need more that 32 I/O and absolute minimal latency for tacking DSP is the only way to go

Re: Apollo 16 and HD Native
 

I have an HD3 Accel rig and Apollo. Impossible latency with Apollo. Have to use console app. Same for all FW interfaces.

OTOH, Apollo was VERY stable for mixing.

Re: Apollo 16 and HD Native
 

Really? Ive scene the videos on Pro Tools Expert and he was able to set the latency to like 32 samples

Re: Apollo 16 and HD Native
 

Check to see if the non realtime bounce would work. Been reading too much so i don't recall where I saw uad card-plugs will need real time.

Re: Apollo 16 and HD Native
 

Can you clarify what you mean by "Impossible latency".

Thanks,

Barry

Re: Apollo 16 and HD Native
 

Yes, but it's still MUCH more latency than TDM.

Re: Apollo 16 and HD Native
 

Saw confirmation of NO on the UAD Forum.
http://uadforum.com/general-discussi...tml#post120647