Tracking latency 001 vs. 002, 003?
 

I've been a long time 001 user with an Apogee Rosetta
200 for AD/DA. I'm thinking of either upgrading to
a new 003 & Mac Pro or a used HD1 system and my
current G4 1.25 single processor. I never use the
low latency feature because of the Apogee. At 128,
I have no tracking problems. I just discovered that the
002, because it's firewire, has more latency. Has anybody
found this to be a major problem? Anyone with an 003
yet?

Re: Tracking latency 001 vs. 002, 003?
 

The 002/003 have buffer settings as low as 64 samples, so you'll be fine if you're used to working at 128.

Re: Tracking latency 001 vs. 002, 003?
 

Thanks. Any problems working at 64 with a fast comp. like
a MacPro 2.66?