PTPerson
04-01-2001, 04:27 PM
After another really heavy mixing session i'm now more than ever convinced that the DSP section on the ProControl is (and excuse me if someone finds this insulting) piss poor.
Really digi, only 8 pots for Plugin tweaking?.
Some plug in's require up to 6 pages of the DSP section and it's a total pain in the ass constantly paging thru to tweak.
Howabout the "Big Fat DSP section" that i suggested a while back? with 48 or so POTS, Displays etc so we can hit the EQ button on the strip and go directly to it on the pack with EVERYTHING displayed at once!.
Hell i'll even design the thing if you're interested. (well i'll knock up a pretty picture that is) http://duc.digidesign.com/ubb/images/icons/smile.gif
Digi i would be thinking hard about a new ProControl for the future, i don't care if it costs a little more but i'd be taking the design philosphy from the Sony Oxford. It's awesome...it has a dedicated Eq section and a dedicated dynamics section. 2 of each i might add for 2 users.
Food for thought
http://duc.digidesign.com/ubb/images/icons/smile.gif
[This message has been edited by PTPerson (edited April 01, 2001).]
Really digi, only 8 pots for Plugin tweaking?.
Some plug in's require up to 6 pages of the DSP section and it's a total pain in the ass constantly paging thru to tweak.
Howabout the "Big Fat DSP section" that i suggested a while back? with 48 or so POTS, Displays etc so we can hit the EQ button on the strip and go directly to it on the pack with EVERYTHING displayed at once!.
Hell i'll even design the thing if you're interested. (well i'll knock up a pretty picture that is) http://duc.digidesign.com/ubb/images/icons/smile.gif
Digi i would be thinking hard about a new ProControl for the future, i don't care if it costs a little more but i'd be taking the design philosphy from the Sony Oxford. It's awesome...it has a dedicated Eq section and a dedicated dynamics section. 2 of each i might add for 2 users.
Food for thought
http://duc.digidesign.com/ubb/images/icons/smile.gif
[This message has been edited by PTPerson (edited April 01, 2001).]